VOT vs. VMGMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX).
VOT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Aug 17, 2006. VMGMX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Sep 27, 2011.
Performance
VOT vs. VMGMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VOT vs. VMGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -7.62% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
VMGMX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares | -10.43% | 10.69% | 15.65% | 23.93% | -28.84% | 20.48% | 34.45% | 33.85% | -5.61% | 21.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a -7.62% return, which is significantly higher than VMGMX's -10.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOT having a 10.62% annualized return and VMGMX not far behind at 10.28%.
VOT
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -7.62%
- 6M
- -12.08%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.62%
VMGMX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- -10.43%
- 6M
- -14.69%
- 1Y
- 2.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VOT vs. VMGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VOT and VMGMX have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VOT vs. VMGMX — Risk / Return Rank
VOT
VMGMX
VOT vs. VMGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOT | VMGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | 0.14 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 0.35 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.05 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 0.06 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | 0.19 | +1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOT | VMGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 0.14 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.18 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.49 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.58 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between VOT and VMGMX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VOT vs. VMGMX - Dividend Comparison
VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than VMGMX's 0.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
VMGMX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares | 0.74% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
VOT vs. VMGMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, which is greater than VMGMX's maximum drawdown of -37.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and VMGMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOT | VMGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.16% | -37.17% | -22.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.96% | -15.95% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | -37.17% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | -37.17% | -0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.36% | -15.95% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.01% | -7.05% | -2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 5.04% | +0.06% |
Volatility
VOT vs. VMGMX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX) at 5.37%. This indicates that VOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VOT | VMGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 5.37% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 12.03% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.01% | 20.88% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 21.36% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 20.91% | +0.01% |