PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOT vs. IJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOT vs. IJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 12.55% return. Over the past 10 years, VOT has outperformed IJH with an annualized return of 11.95%, while IJH has yielded a comparatively lower 11.12% annualized return.


VOT

1D
0.12%
1M
1.80%
YTD
5.49%
6M
3.73%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
11.95%

IJH

1D
0.22%
1M
0.16%
YTD
12.55%
6M
12.75%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
11.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOT vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
5.49%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
12.55%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%26.10%-11.19%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VOT and IJH is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2006

0.90

The correlation between VOT and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOT vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOT
IJH

Technology

28.9%
15.7%

Industrials

23.7%
25.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
10.7%

Healthcare

9.3%
8.6%

Financial Services

6.8%
14.4%

Real Estate

4.8%
7.5%

Communication Services

3.8%
1.0%

Utilities

3.5%
3.1%

Energy

2.7%
5.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
3.8%

Technology

VOT
28.9%
IJH
15.7%

Industrials

VOT
23.7%
IJH
25.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VOT
13.9%
IJH
10.7%

Healthcare

VOT
9.3%
IJH
8.6%

Financial Services

VOT
6.8%
IJH
14.4%

Real Estate

VOT
4.8%
IJH
7.5%

Communication Services

VOT
3.8%
IJH
1.0%

Utilities

VOT
3.5%
IJH
3.1%

Energy

VOT
2.7%
IJH
5.5%

Basic Materials

VOT
1.8%
IJH
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

VOT
0.8%
IJH
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOT vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOT vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOTIJHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.26

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

2.61

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.46

9.55

-8.09

VOT vs. IJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the IJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOT and IJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOTIJHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

1.48

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.40

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.53

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.46

-0.01

Drawdowns

VOT vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, which is greater than IJH's maximum drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and IJH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOTIJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.16%

-55.07%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

-8.83%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.77%

-24.10%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.19%

-24.10%

-13.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.19%

-42.18%

+4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

-1.79%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.96%

-7.57%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

2.41%

+2.92%

Volatility

VOT vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 4.17%. This indicates that VOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOTIJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

4.17%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.85%

11.49%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

15.64%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

19.76%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

21.19%

-0.17%

VOT vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VOT and IJH have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOT vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison

VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than IJH's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.20%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.63%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOT and IJH have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOT has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to IJH (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs IJH's -55.07%.

On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 11.95% vs 11.12% for IJH. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOT and IJH have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.63% for VOT.

VOT is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.

IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOT and IJH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer