PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDY vs. XMVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDY vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly lower than XMVM's 17.44% return. Over the past 10 years, MDY has underperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 10.79%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.


MDY

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.06%
6M
9.90%
YTD
14.33%
1Y
22.39%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
10.79%
ALL TIME*
11.29%

XMVM

1D
-0.53%
1M
5.11%
6M
13.72%
YTD
17.44%
1Y
38.27%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
12.44%
ALL TIME*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$420.06M$401.19M$471.25M
$2.16M$2.04M$1.98M

MDY vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
14.33%7.19%13.64%16.07%-13.28%24.53%13.50%25.78%-11.29%15.93%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
17.44%18.46%11.73%16.31%-8.21%35.15%5.68%30.38%-9.62%2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MDY and XMVM is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005

0.89

The correlation between MDY and XMVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MDY vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDY
XMVM

Industrials

21.7%
11.7%

Technology

15.3%
5.1%

Financial Services

14.3%
37.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
14.8%

Healthcare

10.2%
2.5%

Real Estate

7.6%
4.9%

Basic Materials

6.9%
0.8%

Energy

5.2%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
1.2%

Utilities

2.9%
8.5%

Communication Services

1.5%
0.9%

Industrials

MDY
21.7%
XMVM
11.7%

Technology

MDY
15.3%
XMVM
5.1%

Financial Services

MDY
14.3%
XMVM
37.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MDY
10.2%
XMVM
14.8%

Healthcare

MDY
10.2%
XMVM
2.5%

Real Estate

MDY
7.6%
XMVM
4.9%

Basic Materials

MDY
6.9%
XMVM
0.8%

Energy

MDY
5.2%
XMVM
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

MDY
3.2%
XMVM
1.2%

Utilities

MDY
2.9%
XMVM
8.5%

Communication Services

MDY
1.5%
XMVM
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDY vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MDY
MDY Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MDY vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDYXMVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.91

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.48

12.52

-4.04

MDY vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDY and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDY vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and XMVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYXMVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.33%

-62.83%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-9.18%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.03%

-24.12%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.03%

-24.12%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.22%

-45.07%

+2.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-0.71%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-10.20%

+3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.86%

-0.42%

Volatility

MDY vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYXMVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.29%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

9.25%

+2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

14.85%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.69%

21.24%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.14%

22.74%

-1.60%

MDY vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDY vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than XMVM's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
1.02%1.15%1.18%1.21%1.37%0.96%1.12%1.34%1.39%1.18%1.31%1.35%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.79%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDY and XMVM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDY has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to XMVM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

On 10-year performance, XMVM leads with 12.44% vs 10.79% for MDY. On fees, MDY is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMVM has performed better with a 12.44% return vs 10.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MDY is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.02% for MDY.

MDY is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while XMVM is Momentum. MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDY and XMVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer