MDY vs. XMVM
MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) and XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDY is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while XMVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDY returned 11.05%/yr vs 11.80%/yr for XMVM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDY charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XMVM.
Performance
MDY vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 14.02% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 8.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MDY has underperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 11.05%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.80% annualized return.
MDY
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 14.02%
- 6M
- 15.05%
- 1Y
- 26.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
XMVM
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 8.55%
- 6M
- 12.23%
- 1Y
- 31.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
MDY vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 14.02% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 15.93% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 8.55% | 18.46% | 11.73% | 16.31% | -8.21% | 35.15% | 5.68% | 30.38% | -9.62% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and XMVM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005 | 0.89 |
The correlation between MDY and XMVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MDY vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDY
XMVM
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDY
XMVM
Technology
MDY
XMVM
Financial Services
MDY
XMVM
Consumer Cyclical
MDY
XMVM
Healthcare
MDY
XMVM
Real Estate
MDY
XMVM
Energy
MDY
XMVM
Basic Materials
MDY
XMVM
Consumer Defensive
MDY
XMVM
Utilities
MDY
XMVM
Communication Services
MDY
XMVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
XMVM
MDY vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDY | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.73 | 2.06 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 2.95 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.37 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.99 | 10.42 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDY | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.06 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.45 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.43 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
MDY vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and XMVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -62.83% | +7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -9.18% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | -24.12% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -24.12% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | -45.07% | +2.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.71% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -10.27% | +3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.97% | -0.55% |
Volatility
MDY vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.48%. This indicates that MDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 3.48% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 9.76% | +1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.48% | 15.37% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 21.54% | -1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 22.81% | -1.62% |
MDY vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDY vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than XMVM's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.95% | 2.07% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDY and XMVM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDY has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to XMVM (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs XMVM's -62.83%.
On 10-year performance, XMVM leads with 11.80% vs 11.05% for MDY. On fees, MDY is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMVM has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDY is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.
XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.04% for MDY.
MDY is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while XMVM is Momentum. MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.39% for XMVM.
XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDY and XMVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer