PortfoliosLab logo
VOT vs. VOE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VOT and VOE is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

VOT vs. VOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

300.00%350.00%400.00%450.00%500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
472.53%
365.39%
VOT
VOE

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VOT:

0.59

VOE:

0.41

Sortino Ratio

VOT:

0.92

VOE:

0.72

Omega Ratio

VOT:

1.13

VOE:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

VOT:

0.56

VOE:

0.39

Martin Ratio

VOT:

2.00

VOE:

1.29

Ulcer Index

VOT:

6.11%

VOE:

5.59%

Daily Std Dev

VOT:

21.85%

VOE:

16.63%

Max Drawdown

VOT:

-60.17%

VOE:

-61.54%

Current Drawdown

VOT:

-7.25%

VOE:

-8.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than VOE's -1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, VOT has outperformed VOE with an annualized return of 9.88%, while VOE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.01% annualized return.


VOT

YTD

1.24%

1M

18.56%

6M

-0.85%

1Y

12.74%

5Y*

11.84%

10Y*

9.88%

VOE

YTD

-1.05%

1M

12.10%

6M

-5.74%

1Y

6.77%

5Y*

14.42%

10Y*

8.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VOT vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VOT and VOE have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VOT vs. VOE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOT is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOT is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOT is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOT is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOT is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOT is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VOE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOE is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOE is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOE is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOE is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOE is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOE is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VOT vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current VOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the VOE Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOT and VOE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.59
0.41
VOT
VOE

Dividends

VOT vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison

VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than VOE's 2.35% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.68%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%0.79%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
2.35%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%1.67%

Drawdowns

VOT vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.17%, roughly equal to the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and VOE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-7.25%
-8.59%
VOT
VOE

Volatility

VOT vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) at 8.63%. This indicates that VOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.36%
8.63%
VOT
VOE