MDY vs. IJH
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH).
MDY and IJH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MDY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on May 4, 1995. IJH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both MDY and IJH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MDY or IJH.
Key characteristics
MDY | IJH | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 19.51% | 19.83% |
1Y Return | 36.70% | 37.19% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 5.71% | 5.97% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 12.08% | 12.31% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 10.17% | 10.39% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.23 | 2.27 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.14 | 3.19 |
Omega Ratio | 1.39 | 1.40 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.61 | 2.72 |
Martin Ratio | 13.22 | 13.54 |
Ulcer Index | 2.76% | 2.73% |
Daily Std Dev | 16.37% | 16.33% |
Max Drawdown | -55.33% | -55.07% |
Current Drawdown | -1.05% | -1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and IJH is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MDY vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MDY having a 19.51% return and IJH slightly higher at 19.83%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDY having a 10.17% annualized return and IJH not far ahead at 10.39%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDY vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MDY vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MDY vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than IJH's 1.22% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.09% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% | 1.17% | 1.07% |
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.34% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
MDY vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, roughly equal to the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and IJH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MDY vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.