MDY vs. VOO
MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDY is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDY returned 11.52%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDY charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
MDY vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 15.58% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MDY has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.52%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.
MDY
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 15.58%
- 6M
- 13.18%
- 1Y
- 27.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.52%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
MDY vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 15.58% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 15.93% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and VOO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MDY and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MDY vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDY
VOO
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDY
VOO
Technology
MDY
VOO
Financial Services
MDY
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
MDY
VOO
Healthcare
MDY
VOO
Real Estate
MDY
VOO
Energy
MDY
VOO
Basic Materials
MDY
VOO
Consumer Defensive
MDY
VOO
Utilities
MDY
VOO
Communication Services
MDY
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
VOO
MDY vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDY | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.39 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.02 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.23 | 13.58 | -2.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDY vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -33.99% | -21.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -8.90% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | -18.69% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -24.52% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | -33.99% | -8.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -1.74% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -3.68% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 1.98% | +0.44% |
Volatility
MDY vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 4.53% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 4.60% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 9.73% | +1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.80% | 12.39% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 16.90% | +2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 18.05% | +3.17% |
MDY vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDY vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.01% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDY and VOO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to MDY (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 11.52% for MDY. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 11.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 1.01% for MDY.
MDY is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDY and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer