MAGC vs. ECNS
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS).
MAGC and ECNS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAGC is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Oct 3, 2024. ECNS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Small Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2010.
Performance
MAGC vs. ECNS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MAGC vs. ECNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | -12.21% | 16.35% | -14.54% |
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | -0.77% | 36.49% | -9.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGC achieves a -12.21% return, which is significantly lower than ECNS's -0.77% return.
MAGC
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- -12.21%
- 6M
- -24.11%
- 1Y
- -18.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECNS
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -9.47%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -14.00%
- 1Y
- 24.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- -5.59%
- 10Y*
- 2.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MAGC vs. ECNS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MAGC and ECNS have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Return for Risk
MAGC vs. ECNS — Risk / Return Rank
MAGC
ECNS
MAGC vs. ECNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGC | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | 0.99 | -1.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | 1.38 | -2.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.21 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 1.39 | -2.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 3.09 | -4.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGC | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 | 0.99 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.03 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGC and ECNS is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MAGC vs. ECNS - Dividend Comparison
MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than ECNS's 6.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | 4.67% | 4.10% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 6.25% | 6.20% | 5.98% | 4.89% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.29% | 3.58% |
Drawdowns
MAGC vs. ECNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGC drawdown since its inception was -28.90%, smaller than the maximum ECNS drawdown of -63.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGC and ECNS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGC | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.90% | -63.43% | +34.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.90% | -16.93% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.23% | -36.12% | +9.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.68% | -29.32% | +15.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.24% | 7.58% | +5.66% |
Volatility
MAGC vs. ECNS - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) has a higher volatility of 9.34% compared to iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) at 7.46%. This indicates that MAGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MAGC | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.34% | 7.46% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.38% | 15.18% | +3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.93% | 25.22% | +5.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.73% | 29.43% | +5.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.73% | 26.05% | +8.68% |