ECNS vs. FLCH
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH).
ECNS and FLCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECNS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Small Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2010. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both ECNS and FLCH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ECNS or FLCH.
Correlation
The correlation between ECNS and FLCH is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ECNS vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ECNS:
0.16
FLCH:
0.59
ECNS:
0.50
FLCH:
1.08
ECNS:
1.06
FLCH:
1.14
ECNS:
0.09
FLCH:
0.31
ECNS:
0.42
FLCH:
1.59
ECNS:
13.68%
FLCH:
11.65%
ECNS:
35.02%
FLCH:
31.53%
ECNS:
-63.43%
FLCH:
-62.09%
ECNS:
-55.64%
FLCH:
-48.82%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECNS achieves a -5.91% return, which is significantly lower than FLCH's -3.75% return.
ECNS
-5.91%
-6.79%
4.57%
6.55%
-6.96%
-1.97%
FLCH
-3.75%
-5.17%
6.80%
18.81%
-5.27%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ECNS vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECNS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ECNS vs. FLCH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ECNS
FLCH
ECNS vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ECNS vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than FLCH's 2.99% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 6.35% | 5.98% | 4.90% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.30% | 3.58% | 2.51% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.99% | 2.88% | 3.46% | 2.69% | 1.49% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ECNS vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECNS drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECNS and FLCH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ECNS vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 5.15%. This indicates that ECNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.