PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGC vs. FXP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MAGC vs. FXP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MAGC vs. FXP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAGC
Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF
-12.21%16.35%-14.54%
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
11.77%-45.32%14.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGC achieves a -12.21% return, which is significantly lower than FXP's 11.77% return.


MAGC

1D
2.62%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-12.21%
6M
-24.11%
1Y
-18.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FXP

1D
-5.19%
1M
7.12%
YTD
11.77%
6M
25.78%
1Y
-12.70%
3Y*
-27.68%
5Y*
-16.72%
10Y*
-23.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MAGC vs. FXP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FXP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MAGC vs. FXP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGC
MAGC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MAGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGC Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FXP
FXP Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGC vs. FXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGCFXPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.61

-0.27

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.72

-0.07

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.99

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

-0.24

-0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.52

-0.30

-1.22

MAGC vs. FXP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the FXP Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGC and FXP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGCFXPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

-0.27

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.25

-0.44

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between MAGC and FXP is -0.92. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MAGC vs. FXP - Dividend Comparison

MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than FXP's 4.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MAGC
Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF
4.67%4.10%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
4.18%9.57%3.55%2.20%0.06%0.00%0.06%1.20%0.16%

Drawdowns

MAGC vs. FXP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGC drawdown since its inception was -28.90%, smaller than the maximum FXP drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGC and FXP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGCFXPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.90%

-99.94%

+71.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.90%

-52.42%

+23.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.23%

-99.92%

+73.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.68%

-94.10%

+80.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.24%

42.47%

-29.23%

Volatility

MAGC vs. FXP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) is 9.34%, while ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a volatility of 13.95%. This indicates that MAGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MAGCFXPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.34%

13.95%

-4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.38%

28.87%

-10.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.93%

47.71%

-16.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.73%

63.04%

-28.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.73%

54.96%

-20.23%