MAGC vs. FXP

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MAGC (Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF) and FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGC is a China Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while FXP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). MAGC is actively managed, while FXP is passively managed. Over the past year, MAGC returned -15.61% vs -12.53% for FXP. At a correlation of -0.92, they often move in opposite directions. MAGC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FXP.

Performance

MAGC vs. FXP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGC achieves a -15.36% return, which is significantly lower than FXP's 8.59% return.

MAGC

• 1D: 4.10%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: -15.36%
• 6M: -17.67%
• 1Y: -15.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FXP

• 1D: -5.83%
• 1M: 2.41%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 6M: 13.43%
• 1Y: -12.53%
• 3Y*: -31.27%
• 5Y*: -17.61%
• 10Y*: -23.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGC vs. FXP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	-15.36%	16.35%	-14.54%
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50	8.59%	-45.32%	14.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGC and FXP is -0.89, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024	-0.92

The correlation between MAGC and FXP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.92 to -0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MAGC vs. FXP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGC

MAGC Risk / Return Rank: 4
MAGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MAGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MAGC Omega Ratio Rank: 4
MAGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
MAGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

FXP

FXP Risk / Return Rank: 5
FXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FXP Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FXP Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGC vs. FXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAGC	FXP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	-0.32	-0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.73	-0.21	-0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	0.98	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	-0.48	+0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.85	-0.75	-0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAGC vs. FXP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the FXP Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGC and FXP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAGC	FXP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.59	-0.32	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.29	-0.44	+0.15

Drawdowns

MAGC vs. FXP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGC drawdown since its inception was -32.86%, smaller than the maximum FXP drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGC and FXP.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGC	FXP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.86%	-99.94%	+67.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.86%	-28.62%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-82.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-87.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-94.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.88%	-99.92%	+71.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.12%	-94.15%	+79.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.98%	19.27%	-2.29%

Volatility

MAGC vs. FXP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) is 10.63%, while ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a volatility of 14.45%. This indicates that MAGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGC	FXP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.63%	14.45%	-3.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.54%	28.53%	-8.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.65%	39.08%	-12.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.36%	63.11%	-28.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.36%	54.90%	-20.54%

MAGC vs. FXP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FXP's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGC vs. FXP - Dividend Comparison

MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than FXP's 4.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50	4.31%	9.57%	3.55%	2.20%	0.06%	0.00%	0.06%	1.20%	0.16%
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	4.85%	4.10%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGC and FXP in my portfolio?

MAGC and FXP have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGC or FXP?

FXP has higher volatility (14.45%) compared to MAGC (10.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGC dropped -32.86% vs FXP's -99.94%.

Which ETF is better, MAGC or FXP?

On 1-year performance, FXP leads with -12.53% vs -15.61% for MAGC. On fees, MAGC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MAGC has been the lower-risk option at 10.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGC or FXP?

Over the 1-year period, FXP has performed better with a -12.53% return vs -15.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGC or FXP?

MAGC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGC or FXP?

MAGC has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 4.31% for FXP.

What is the main difference between MAGC and FXP?

MAGC is categorized as China Equities, while FXP is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MAGC and 0.95% for FXP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.