MAGC vs. CN
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN).
MAGC and CN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAGC is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Oct 3, 2024. CN is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014.
Performance
MAGC vs. CN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MAGC vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | -13.26% | 16.35% | -14.54% |
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
MAGC
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- -13.26%
- 6M
- -25.67%
- 1Y
- -19.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CN
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MAGC vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MAGC vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank
MAGC
CN
MAGC vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGC | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGC | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.27 | — | — |
Dividends
MAGC vs. CN - Dividend Comparison
MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | 4.73% | 4.10% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 0.78% | 4.18% | 2.09% | 0.81% | 11.41% | 14.00% |
Drawdowns
MAGC vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGC | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.11% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.71% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.32% | — | — |
Volatility
MAGC vs. CN - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MAGC | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.91% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.70% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.70% | — | — |