MAGC vs. MAGS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS).

MAGC and MAGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAGC is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Oct 3, 2024. MAGS is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Apr 10, 2023.

Performance

MAGC vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MAGC vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	-12.21%	16.35%	-14.54%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	-12.16%	22.99%	17.47%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MAGC having a -12.21% return and MAGS slightly higher at -12.16%.

MAGC

• 1D: 2.62%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: -12.21%
• 6M: -24.11%
• 1Y: -18.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAGS

• 1D: 4.60%
• 1M: -5.56%
• YTD: -12.16%
• 6M: -9.36%
• 1Y: 28.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGC vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.

MAGC

Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF

MAGS

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF

Return for Risk

MAGC vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGC

MAGC Risk / Return Rank: 2
MAGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MAGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MAGC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
MAGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MAGC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 62
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGC vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAGC	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.61	0.99	-1.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.72	1.61	-2.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.21	-0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	1.49	-2.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.52	5.25	-6.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAGC vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGC and MAGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAGC	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.61	0.99	-1.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	1.34	-1.59

Correlation

The correlation between MAGC and MAGS is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MAGC vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than MAGS's 1.68% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	4.67%	4.10%	1.02%	0.00%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.68%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%

Drawdowns

MAGC vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGC drawdown since its inception was -28.90%, roughly equal to the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGC and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGC	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.90%	-29.91%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.90%	-18.62%	-10.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.23%	-14.87%	-11.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.68%	-4.75%	-8.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.24%	5.29%	+7.95%

Volatility

MAGC vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) has a higher volatility of 9.34% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 8.36%. This indicates that MAGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGC	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.34%	8.36%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.38%	15.45%	+2.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.93%	28.68%	+2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.73%	26.29%	+8.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.73%	26.29%	+8.44%