MAGC vs. ASHS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MAGC (Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF) and ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds. MAGC is actively managed, while ASHS is passively managed. Over the past year, MAGC returned -13.35% vs 31.86% for ASHS. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MAGC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHS.

Performance

MAGC vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGC achieves a -13.08% return, which is significantly lower than ASHS's 5.42% return.

MAGC

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 17.78%
• 6M: -10.64%
• YTD: -13.08%
• 1Y: -13.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -7.38%

ASHS

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: -11.80%
• 6M: -5.14%
• YTD: 5.42%
• 1Y: 31.86%
• 3Y*: 10.54%
• 5Y*: 2.02%
• 10Y*: 2.41%
• ALL TIME*: 5.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	$378.39K	$628.93K	$596.17K
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	$112.87K	$118.23K	$142.33K

MAGC vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	-13.08%	16.35%	-14.03%
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	5.42%	39.48%	-16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGC and ASHS is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	0.48

Return for Risk

MAGC vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAGC

MAGC Risk / Return Rank: 5
MAGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
MAGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MAGC Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MAGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MAGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

ASHS

ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 48
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAGC vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGC	ASHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	1.20	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.65	1.72	-2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.21	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.36	1.83	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.69	5.53	-6.23

MAGC vs. ASHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the ASHS Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGC and ASHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGC vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGC drawdown since its inception was -41.99%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGC and ASHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGC	ASHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.99%	-69.90%	+27.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.99%	-17.46%	-24.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.96%	-39.15%	+12.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.77%	-48.36%	+31.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.77%	5.76%	+16.01%

Volatility

MAGC vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) is 8.92%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a volatility of 12.45%. This indicates that MAGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGC	ASHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.92%	12.45%	-3.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.20%	21.30%	-0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.85%	26.59%	+1.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.02%	27.11%	+6.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.02%	25.86%	+8.16%

MAGC vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGC vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison

MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	0.65%	1.90%	0.76%	0.43%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.34%
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	4.72%	4.10%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGC and ASHS in my portfolio?

MAGC and ASHS have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGC or ASHS?

ASHS has higher volatility (12.45%) compared to MAGC (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGC dropped -41.99% vs ASHS's -69.90%.

Which ETF is better, MAGC or ASHS?

On 1-year performance, ASHS leads with 31.86% vs -13.35% for MAGC. On fees, MAGC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MAGC has been the lower-risk option at 8.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGC or ASHS?

Over the 1-year period, ASHS has performed better with a 31.86% return vs -13.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGC or ASHS?

MAGC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGC or ASHS?

MAGC has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.00% for ASHS.

What is the main difference between MAGC and ASHS?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MAGC and 0.65% for ASHS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.