ECNS vs. MCHI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI).
ECNS and MCHI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECNS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Small Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2010. MCHI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2011. Both ECNS and MCHI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ECNS or MCHI.
Key characteristics
| ECNS | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -8.11% | 1.47% |
| 1Y Return | -23.09% | -7.33% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -22.36% | -19.32% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -8.87% | -6.59% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -2.70% | 1.24% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -1.05 | -0.39 |
| Daily Std Dev | 24.14% | 25.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -63.43% | -62.84% |
| Current Drawdown | -58.98% | -54.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECNS and MCHI is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ECNS vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ECNS achieves a -8.11% return, which is significantly lower than MCHI's 1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, ECNS has underperformed MCHI with an annualized return of -2.70%, while MCHI has yielded a comparatively higher 1.24% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ECNS vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ECNS and MCHI have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ECNS vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ECNS vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison
ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, more than MCHI's 3.44% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 5.33% | 4.90% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.29% | 3.58% | 2.51% | 2.85% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 3.44% | 3.49% | 2.14% | 1.03% | 1.03% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.54% | 1.64% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.37% |
Drawdowns
ECNS vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECNS drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, roughly equal to the maximum MCHI drawdown of -62.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECNS and MCHI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ECNS vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) at 5.22%. This indicates that ECNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.