ECNS vs. EWT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT).
ECNS and EWT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECNS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Small Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2010. EWT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Taiwan Index. It was launched on Jun 20, 2000. Both ECNS and EWT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ECNS or EWT.
Correlation
The correlation between ECNS and EWT is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ECNS vs. EWT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ECNS:
0.19
EWT:
0.82
ECNS:
0.55
EWT:
1.22
ECNS:
1.07
EWT:
1.15
ECNS:
0.11
EWT:
1.03
ECNS:
0.51
EWT:
3.71
ECNS:
13.43%
EWT:
4.71%
ECNS:
35.20%
EWT:
21.40%
ECNS:
-63.43%
EWT:
-64.26%
ECNS:
-53.67%
EWT:
-9.26%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECNS achieves a 3.77% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ECNS has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of -1.43%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.73% annualized return.
ECNS
3.77%
1.02%
5.68%
6.93%
-4.78%
-1.43%
EWT
12.13%
-3.71%
-5.19%
17.16%
11.85%
10.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ECNS vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ECNS and EWT have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ECNS vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ECNS vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison
ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.72%, less than EWT's 11.12% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 6.08% | 4.90% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.30% | 3.58% | 2.51% | 2.85% |
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.37% | 12.01% | 18.82% | 2.64% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% | 1.93% | 1.82% |
Drawdowns
ECNS vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECNS drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, roughly equal to the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECNS and EWT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ECNS vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) has a higher volatility of 10.47% compared to iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) at 5.90%. This indicates that ECNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.