PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECNS vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ECNS vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ECNS vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
1.03%36.49%5.64%-23.05%-24.58%2.11%25.42%7.84%-18.27%27.55%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
12.89%28.38%16.11%23.97%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECNS achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 12.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ECNS has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 2.41%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.12% annualized return.


ECNS

1D
1.81%
1M
-6.73%
YTD
1.03%
6M
-12.80%
1Y
25.53%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
-5.25%
10Y*
2.41%

EWT

1D
1.13%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
12.89%
6M
16.96%
1Y
55.63%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
15.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ECNS vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ECNS and EWT have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Return for Risk

ECNS vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECNS
ECNS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ECNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECNS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ECNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECNS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECNS vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECNSEWTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

2.08

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

2.78

-1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.73

-2.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.54

14.90

-11.37

ECNS vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECNS Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECNS and EWT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECNSEWTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

2.08

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.47

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.71

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.20

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between ECNS and EWT is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ECNS vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, more than EWT's 3.93% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
6.14%6.20%5.98%4.89%3.54%4.87%3.59%3.23%6.16%3.18%4.29%3.58%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
3.93%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%

Drawdowns

ECNS vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECNS drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, roughly equal to the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECNS and EWT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ECNSEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.43%

-64.37%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.93%

-15.53%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.61%

-38.88%

-20.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.43%

-38.88%

-24.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.96%

-6.93%

-28.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.33%

-19.35%

-9.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.63%

3.89%

+3.74%

Volatility

ECNS vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) is 5.98%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 9.80%. This indicates that ECNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ECNSEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

9.80%

-3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.21%

18.16%

-2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.26%

26.86%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.43%

22.32%

+7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.05%

21.22%

+4.83%