ECNS vs. ASHS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS).
ECNS and ASHS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECNS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Small Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2010. ASHS is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the CSI 500 Index. It was launched on May 21, 2014. Both ECNS and ASHS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ECNS or ASHS.
Correlation
The correlation between ECNS and ASHS is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ECNS vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
ECNS:
0.23
ASHS:
0.15
ECNS:
0.66
ASHS:
0.46
ECNS:
1.09
ASHS:
1.07
ECNS:
0.17
ASHS:
0.07
ECNS:
0.64
ASHS:
0.24
ECNS:
16.06%
ASHS:
20.29%
ECNS:
36.52%
ASHS:
39.12%
ECNS:
-63.43%
ASHS:
-69.90%
ECNS:
-48.34%
ASHS:
-57.86%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECNS achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than ASHS's 1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ECNS has outperformed ASHS with an annualized return of -4.22%, while ASHS has yielded a comparatively lower -6.25% annualized return.
ECNS
9.56%
8.88%
13.39%
7.25%
-1.45%
-4.22%
ASHS
1.84%
4.39%
-3.29%
4.30%
0.96%
-6.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ECNS vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECNS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ECNS vs. ASHS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ECNS
ASHS
ECNS vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
ECNS vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison
ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than ASHS's 0.68% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 5.46% | 5.98% | 4.90% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.30% | 3.58% | 2.51% |
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.68% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.91% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% | 0.59% |
Drawdowns
ECNS vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECNS drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECNS and ASHS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
ECNS vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) at 5.27%. This indicates that ECNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...