LXU vs. UAN
LXU (LSB Industries, Inc.) and UAN (CVR Partners, LP) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — LXU in Chemicals, UAN in Agricultural Inputs. Over the past 10 years, LXU returned 1.08%/yr vs 16.21%/yr for UAN. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LXU vs. UAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LXU achieves a 14.00% return, which is significantly lower than UAN's 28.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LXU has underperformed UAN with an annualized return of 1.08%, while UAN has yielded a comparatively higher 16.21% annualized return.
LXU
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -10.03%
- 6M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- -4.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 1.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.26%
UAN
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 26.82%
- YTD
- 28.03%
- 1Y
- 47.18%
- 3Y*
- 25.54%
- 5Y*
- 37.95%
- 10Y*
- 16.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.80M | $9.21M | $10.38M | |
| $5.13M | $4.10M | $5.42M |
LXU vs. UAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 14.00% | 11.99% | -18.47% | -30.00% | 20.36% | 323.75% | -19.29% | -23.91% | -36.99% | 4.04% |
UAN CVR Partners, LP | 28.03% | 54.09% | 27.18% | -13.80% | 43.68% | 452.88% | -48.32% | 1.48% | 3.66% | -45.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LXU and UAN is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
LXU:
$697.09M
UAN:
$1.34B
LXU:
$0.68
UAN:
$15.16
LXU:
14.32
UAN:
8.35
LXU:
0.04
UAN:
0.15
LXU:
0.80
UAN:
1.98
LXU:
$658.06M
UAN:
$676.86M
LXU:
$114.00M
UAN:
$173.51M
LXU:
$109.89M
UAN:
$275.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LXU vs. UAN — Risk / Return Rank
LXU
UAN
LXU vs. UAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) and CVR Partners, LP (UAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LXU | UAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.26 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 2.40 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.31 | 5.81 | -4.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LXU vs. UAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LXU drawdown since its inception was -97.83%, roughly equal to the maximum UAN drawdown of -96.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LXU and UAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LXU | UAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.83% | -96.77% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.59% | -19.73% | -22.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.48% | -26.70% | -27.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.38% | -49.19% | -32.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.54% | -90.38% | -1.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.72% | -5.94% | -67.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.27% | -47.21% | -9.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.52% | 8.15% | +8.37% |
Volatility
LXU vs. UAN - Volatility Comparison
LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) has a higher volatility of 15.25% compared to CVR Partners, LP (UAN) at 7.92%. This indicates that LXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LXU | UAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.25% | 7.92% | +7.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.58% | 33.97% | +8.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.40% | 40.59% | +13.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.89% | 41.37% | +16.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.32% | 54.57% | +18.75% |
Dividends
LXU vs. UAN - Dividend Comparison
LXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UAN CVR Partners, LP | 9.70% | 11.63% | 8.81% | 40.64% | 19.21% | 5.62% | 0.00% | 12.90% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 11.81% | 15.61% |
Financials
LXU vs. UAN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LSB Industries, Inc. and CVR Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LXU vs. UAN - Profitability Comparison
LXU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.46M and revenue of 168.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.8%.
UAN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CVR Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 65.14M and revenue of 202.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.
LXU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.56M and revenue of 168.09M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.9%.
UAN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CVR Partners, LP reported an operating income of 84.82M and revenue of 202.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.0%.
LXU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a net income of -6.19M and revenue of 168.09M, resulting in a net margin of -3.7%.
UAN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CVR Partners, LP reported a net income of 77.50M and revenue of 202.19M, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LXU and UAN have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LXU has higher volatility (15.25%) compared to UAN (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LXU dropped -97.83% vs UAN's -96.77%.
UAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LXU and UAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer