PortfoliosLab logo
LXU vs. UAN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LXU and UAN is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LXU vs. UAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) and CVR Partners, LP (UAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LXU:

-0.40

UAN:

0.39

Sortino Ratio

LXU:

-0.20

UAN:

0.85

Omega Ratio

LXU:

0.98

UAN:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

LXU:

-0.20

UAN:

0.33

Martin Ratio

LXU:

-0.77

UAN:

1.05

Ulcer Index

LXU:

22.69%

UAN:

12.52%

Daily Std Dev

LXU:

51.08%

UAN:

29.49%

Max Drawdown

LXU:

-97.83%

UAN:

-96.77%

Current Drawdown

LXU:

-80.29%

UAN:

-20.40%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LXU:

$537.65M

UAN:

$867.55M

EPS

LXU:

-$0.37

UAN:

$7.13

PEG Ratio

LXU:

-0.24

UAN:

-1.30

PS Ratio

LXU:

1.02

UAN:

1.61

PB Ratio

LXU:

1.10

UAN:

2.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

LXU:

$527.63M

UAN:

$540.53M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LXU:

$39.90M

UAN:

$133.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

LXU:

$75.92M

UAN:

$132.59M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LXU achieves a -4.22% return, which is significantly lower than UAN's 11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, LXU has underperformed UAN with an annualized return of -14.04%, while UAN has yielded a comparatively higher 3.27% annualized return.


LXU

YTD

-4.22%

1M

35.38%

6M

-16.72%

1Y

-20.29%

5Y*

54.01%

10Y*

-14.04%

UAN

YTD

11.77%

1M

14.96%

6M

19.21%

1Y

11.44%

5Y*

78.11%

10Y*

3.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LXU vs. UAN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LXU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LXU is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LXU is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LXU is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LXU is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LXU is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LXU is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

UAN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UAN is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UAN is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UAN is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UAN is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UAN is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UAN is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LXU vs. UAN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) and CVR Partners, LP (UAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LXU Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the UAN Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LXU and UAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LXU vs. UAN - Dividend Comparison

LXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.79%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LXU
LSB Industries, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UAN
CVR Partners, LP
8.79%8.81%40.64%19.21%5.62%0.00%12.90%0.00%0.61%11.81%15.61%14.48%

Drawdowns

LXU vs. UAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LXU drawdown since its inception was -97.83%, roughly equal to the maximum UAN drawdown of -96.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LXU and UAN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LXU vs. UAN - Volatility Comparison

LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) has a higher volatility of 14.51% compared to CVR Partners, LP (UAN) at 4.64%. This indicates that LXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LXU vs. UAN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LSB Industries, Inc. and CVR Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20212022202320242025
143.43M
142.87M
(LXU) Total Revenue
(UAN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LXU vs. UAN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LSB Industries, Inc. and CVR Partners, LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
10.0%
29.7%
(LXU) Gross Margin
(UAN) Gross Margin
LXU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.38M and revenue of 143.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.0%.

UAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CVR Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 42.44M and revenue of 142.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

LXU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LSB Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.47M and revenue of 143.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

UAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CVR Partners, LP reported an operating income of 34.59M and revenue of 142.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.

LXU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LSB Industries, Inc. reported a net income of -1.64M and revenue of 143.43M, resulting in a net margin of -1.1%.

UAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CVR Partners, LP reported a net income of 27.09M and revenue of 142.87M, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.