LRCX vs. FANG
LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) and FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while FANG operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, LRCX returned 48.23%/yr vs 10.83%/yr for FANG. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LRCX vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 114.54% return, which is significantly higher than FANG's 29.28% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has outperformed FANG with an annualized return of 48.23%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.83% annualized return.
LRCX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 22.62%
- YTD
- 114.54%
- 6M
- 128.79%
- 1Y
- 312.75%
- 3Y*
- 81.91%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 48.23%
FANG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- 29.28%
- 6M
- 24.04%
- 1Y
- 27.23%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 22.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
LRCX vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 114.54% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 29.28% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCX and FANG is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2012 | 0.24 |
The correlation between LRCX and FANG shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LRCX:
$463.20B
FANG:
$54.33B
LRCX:
$5.29
FANG:
$1.40
LRCX:
69.37
FANG:
137.12
LRCX:
21.46
FANG:
3.64
LRCX:
43.76
FANG:
1.49
LRCX:
$21.68B
FANG:
$15.19B
LRCX:
$10.84B
FANG:
$7.30B
LRCX:
$6.10B
FANG:
$5.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCX vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank
LRCX
FANG
LRCX vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCX | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.18 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.26 | 2.56 | +12.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 51.20 | 4.99 | +46.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCX vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, roughly equal to the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and FANG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCX | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.90% | -88.72% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.01% | -12.53% | -7.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.10% | -42.10% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.39% | -42.10% | -14.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.39% | -88.72% | +32.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.59% | +9.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.17% | -19.37% | -8.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 6.43% | -0.48% |
Volatility
LRCX vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 21.52% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 11.03%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCX | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.52% | 11.03% | +10.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.63% | 24.10% | +19.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.78% | 31.48% | +21.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.57% | 37.99% | +8.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.92% | 49.05% | -4.13% |
Dividends
LRCX vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than FANG's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.16% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
LRCX vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LRCX vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCX and FANG have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (21.52%) compared to FANG (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs FANG's -88.72%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.79 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRCX and FANG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer