LRCX vs. NVDA
LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LRCX in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, NVDA in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, LRCX returned 43.64%/yr vs 64.62%/yr for NVDA. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
LRCX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 71.50% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 43.64%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 64.62% annualized return.
LRCX
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -16.62%
- 6M
- 25.75%
- YTD
- 71.50%
- 1Y
- 205.74%
- 3Y*
- 61.40%
- 5Y*
- 37.09%
- 10Y*
- 43.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.67%
NVDA
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 62.93%
- 5Y*
- 59.52%
- 10Y*
- 64.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 36.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.65B | $3.82B | $3.92B | |
| $25.46B | $26.13B | $31.85B |
LRCX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 71.50% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 7.77% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCX and NVDA is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999 | 0.57 |
The correlation between LRCX and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LRCX:
$366.44B
NVDA:
$4.86T
LRCX:
$5.75
NVDA:
$6.53
LRCX:
50.95
NVDA:
30.73
LRCX:
2.88
NVDA:
0.17
LRCX:
15.93
NVDA:
19.35
LRCX:
29.63
NVDA:
25.05
LRCX:
$23.23B
NVDA:
$253.49B
LRCX:
$11.73B
NVDA:
$187.95B
LRCX:
$8.70B
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
LRCX
NVDA
LRCX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.09 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.08 | 0.65 | +4.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.44 | 1.32 | +20.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.90% | -89.72% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.76% | -20.21% | -21.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.10% | -36.88% | -10.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.39% | -66.34% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.39% | -66.34% | +9.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.38% | -14.74% | -17.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.13% | -36.07% | +7.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.87% | 9.90% | -0.03% |
Volatility
LRCX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 27.34% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.04%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.34% | 12.04% | +15.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.39% | 28.30% | +24.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.10% | 36.41% | +26.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.97% | 51.87% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.20% | 49.95% | -3.75% |
Dividends
LRCX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.35% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
LRCX vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LRCX vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 6.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.4%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 2.28B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in a net margin of 33.9%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCX and NVDA have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (27.34%) compared to NVDA (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRCX and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer