PortfoliosLab logo
LRCX vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LRCX and NVDA is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LRCX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%100,000.00%200,000.00%300,000.00%400,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9,970.83%
310,139.36%
LRCX
NVDA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LRCX:

-0.31

NVDA:

0.53

Sortino Ratio

LRCX:

-0.14

NVDA:

1.05

Omega Ratio

LRCX:

0.98

NVDA:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

LRCX:

-0.36

NVDA:

0.78

Martin Ratio

LRCX:

-0.59

NVDA:

1.94

Ulcer Index

LRCX:

28.38%

NVDA:

14.87%

Daily Std Dev

LRCX:

51.74%

NVDA:

59.43%

Max Drawdown

LRCX:

-87.91%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

LRCX:

-32.54%

NVDA:

-21.93%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LRCX:

$95.32B

NVDA:

$2.79T

EPS

LRCX:

$3.59

NVDA:

$2.94

PE Ratio

LRCX:

20.76

NVDA:

38.95

PEG Ratio

LRCX:

1.10

NVDA:

1.61

PS Ratio

LRCX:

5.56

NVDA:

21.28

PB Ratio

LRCX:

10.02

NVDA:

35.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

LRCX:

$17.14B

NVDA:

$104.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LRCX:

$8.24B

NVDA:

$77.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

LRCX:

$5.83B

NVDA:

$68.38B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -13.13% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 27.59%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 72.66% annualized return.


LRCX

YTD

4.65%

1M

5.98%

6M

-3.04%

1Y

-16.05%

5Y*

24.74%

10Y*

27.59%

NVDA

YTD

-13.13%

1M

2.03%

6M

-20.97%

1Y

31.47%

5Y*

72.07%

10Y*

72.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LRCX vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LRCX is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LRCX is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LRCX is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LRCX is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LRCX is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LRCX is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LRCX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRCX and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.31
0.53
LRCX
NVDA

Dividends

LRCX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than NVDA's 0.03% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
1.18%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%0.68%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.03%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

LRCX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and NVDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-32.54%
-21.93%
LRCX
NVDA

Volatility

LRCX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is 13.46%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 14.66%. This indicates that LRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.46%
14.66%
LRCX
NVDA

Financials

LRCX vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20212022202320242025
4.72B
39.33B
(LRCX) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LRCX vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lam Research Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
49.0%
73.0%
(LRCX) Gross Margin
(NVDA) Gross Margin
LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.31B and revenue of 4.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.72B and revenue of 39.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.0%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 1.56B and revenue of 4.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.1%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 24.03B and revenue of 39.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 61.1%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.33B and revenue of 4.72B, resulting in a net margin of 28.2%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 22.09B and revenue of 39.33B, resulting in a net margin of 56.2%.