PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LRCX vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LRCXNVDA
YTD Return21.26%91.10%
1Y Return71.38%224.04%
3Y Return (Ann)17.66%88.27%
5Y Return (Ann)39.33%89.65%
10Y Return (Ann)34.11%71.83%
Sharpe Ratio2.174.58
Daily Std Dev33.78%49.54%
Max Drawdown-87.91%-89.72%
Current Drawdown-4.50%-0.39%

Fundamentals


LRCXNVDA
Market Cap$119.68B$2.25T
EPS$27.19$11.95
PE Ratio33.6775.21
PEG Ratio2.721.19
Revenue (TTM)$14.24B$60.92B
Gross Profit (TTM)$7.87B$15.36B
EBITDA (TTM)$4.42B$34.48B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between LRCX and NVDA is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LRCX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 21.26% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 91.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 34.11%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 71.83% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%50,000.00%100,000.00%150,000.00%200,000.00%250,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12,426.77%
251,441.73%
LRCX
NVDA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lam Research Corporation

NVIDIA Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LRCX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LRCX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.17
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 2.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 3.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.33
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 10.46, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0010.46
NVDA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NVDA, currently valued at 4.58, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.004.58
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NVDA, currently valued at 5.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NVDA, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.64
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NVDA, currently valued at 11.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.0011.47
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NVDA, currently valued at 32.92, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0032.92

LRCX vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 4.58. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LRCX and NVDA.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.006.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.17
4.58
LRCX
NVDA

Dividends

LRCX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.82%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%0.68%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%1.94%

Drawdowns

LRCX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and NVDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-4.50%
-0.39%
LRCX
NVDA

Volatility

LRCX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is 10.86%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 17.51%. This indicates that LRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10.86%
17.51%
LRCX
NVDA

Financials

LRCX vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items