LRCX vs. ASML
Compare and contrast key facts about Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LRCX or ASML.
Correlation
The correlation between LRCX and ASML is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
LRCX vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LRCX:
-0.09
ASML:
-0.06
LRCX:
0.17
ASML:
0.23
LRCX:
1.02
ASML:
1.03
LRCX:
-0.10
ASML:
-0.06
LRCX:
-0.19
ASML:
-0.12
LRCX:
20.31%
ASML:
20.32%
LRCX:
43.33%
ASML:
45.02%
LRCX:
-87.91%
ASML:
-90.00%
LRCX:
-35.93%
ASML:
-35.52%
Fundamentals
LRCX:
$100.12B
ASML:
$289.08B
LRCX:
$3.09
ASML:
$18.53
LRCX:
25.18
ASML:
39.68
LRCX:
1.50
ASML:
1.87
LRCX:
$15.59B
ASML:
$26.24B
LRCX:
$7.42B
ASML:
$13.42B
LRCX:
$5.00B
ASML:
$8.87B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a -7.41% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's -6.02% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 26.18%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 21.77% annualized return.
LRCX
-7.41%
2.80%
-31.23%
-6.66%
20.79%
26.18%
ASML
-6.02%
7.18%
-31.64%
-5.82%
20.29%
21.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LRCX vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LRCX vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than ASML's 0.95% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 1.20% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% | 0.68% | 0.00% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.95% | 0.85% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.59% | 1.20% | 1.10% | 0.75% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 0.77% | 0.75% |
Drawdowns
LRCX vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and ASML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LRCX vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 13.73% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 6.61%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LRCX vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities