PortfoliosLab logo
LRCX vs. ASML
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LRCX and ASML is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LRCX vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10,000.00%20,000.00%30,000.00%40,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6,193.06%
39,771.04%
LRCX
ASML

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LRCX:

-0.33

ASML:

-0.45

Sortino Ratio

LRCX:

-0.18

ASML:

-0.37

Omega Ratio

LRCX:

0.98

ASML:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

LRCX:

-0.38

ASML:

-0.48

Martin Ratio

LRCX:

-0.64

ASML:

-0.76

Ulcer Index

LRCX:

28.31%

ASML:

29.13%

Daily Std Dev

LRCX:

51.74%

ASML:

48.34%

Max Drawdown

LRCX:

-87.91%

ASML:

-90.00%

Current Drawdown

LRCX:

-32.95%

ASML:

-34.97%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LRCX:

$95.32B

ASML:

$271.44B

EPS

LRCX:

$3.59

ASML:

$25.06

PE Ratio

LRCX:

20.76

ASML:

27.55

PEG Ratio

LRCX:

1.10

ASML:

1.33

PS Ratio

LRCX:

5.56

ASML:

8.81

PB Ratio

LRCX:

10.02

ASML:

13.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

LRCX:

$17.14B

ASML:

$30.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LRCX:

$8.24B

ASML:

$15.98B

EBITDA (TTM)

LRCX:

$5.83B

ASML:

$11.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 2.69% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 27.29%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 21.84% annualized return.


LRCX

YTD

4.01%

1M

24.32%

6M

-4.86%

1Y

-17.08%

5Y*

24.60%

10Y*

27.29%

ASML

YTD

2.69%

1M

19.29%

6M

5.10%

1Y

-21.59%

5Y*

19.52%

10Y*

21.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LRCX vs. ASML — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LRCX is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LRCX is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LRCX is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LRCX is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LRCX is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LRCX is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ASML is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ASML is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ASML is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ASML is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ASML is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ASML is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LRCX vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is comparable to the ASML Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRCX and ASML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.33
-0.45
LRCX
ASML

Dividends

LRCX vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than ASML's 0.98% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
1.19%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%0.68%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.98%0.97%0.85%1.21%0.50%0.59%1.20%1.10%0.75%1.02%0.91%0.77%

Drawdowns

LRCX vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and ASML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-32.95%
-34.97%
LRCX
ASML

Volatility

LRCX vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 21.15% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 18.88%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
21.15%
18.88%
LRCX
ASML

Financials

LRCX vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
4.72B
7.74B
(LRCX) Total Revenue
(ASML) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LRCX vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lam Research Corporation and ASML Holding N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

42.0%44.0%46.0%48.0%50.0%52.0%54.0%20212022202320242025
49.0%
54.0%
(LRCX) Gross Margin
(ASML) Gross Margin
LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.31B and revenue of 4.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

ASML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.18B and revenue of 7.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 1.56B and revenue of 4.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.1%.

ASML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 2.74B and revenue of 7.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.33B and revenue of 4.72B, resulting in a net margin of 28.2%.

ASML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.36B and revenue of 7.74B, resulting in a net margin of 30.4%.