PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LRCX vs. ASML
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LRCX and ASML is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

LRCX vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-14.56%
-17.86%
LRCX
ASML

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LRCX:

0.11

ASML:

0.07

Sortino Ratio

LRCX:

0.45

ASML:

0.41

Omega Ratio

LRCX:

1.06

ASML:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

LRCX:

0.13

ASML:

0.08

Martin Ratio

LRCX:

0.22

ASML:

0.15

Ulcer Index

LRCX:

22.06%

ASML:

22.14%

Daily Std Dev

LRCX:

43.14%

ASML:

45.31%

Max Drawdown

LRCX:

-87.91%

ASML:

-90.00%

Current Drawdown

LRCX:

-27.26%

ASML:

-30.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LRCX:

$104.87B

ASML:

$300.01B

EPS

LRCX:

$3.09

ASML:

$18.31

PE Ratio

LRCX:

26.38

ASML:

41.67

PEG Ratio

LRCX:

1.54

ASML:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

LRCX:

$11.83B

ASML:

$19.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LRCX:

$5.67B

ASML:

$9.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

LRCX:

$3.84B

ASML:

$6.34B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 12.83% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 10.09% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 28.00%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 23.19% annualized return.


LRCX

YTD

12.83%

1M

13.53%

6M

-14.56%

1Y

-1.23%

5Y*

22.75%

10Y*

28.00%

ASML

YTD

10.09%

1M

8.12%

6M

-17.86%

1Y

0.32%

5Y*

22.18%

10Y*

23.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LRCX vs. ASML — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LRCX is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LRCX is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LRCX is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LRCX is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LRCX is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LRCX is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ASML is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ASML is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ASML is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ASML is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ASML is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ASML is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LRCX vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.110.07
The chart of Sortino ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.450.41
The chart of Omega ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.061.06
The chart of Calmar ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.130.08
The chart of Martin ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.220.15
LRCX
ASML

The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is higher than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRCX and ASML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.11
0.07
LRCX
ASML

Dividends

LRCX vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than ASML's 0.88% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
1.06%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%0.68%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.88%0.97%0.85%1.27%0.50%0.59%1.20%1.10%0.75%1.02%0.91%0.77%

Drawdowns

LRCX vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and ASML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-27.26%
-30.28%
LRCX
ASML

Volatility

LRCX vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 10.88% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 10.22%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
10.88%
10.22%
LRCX
ASML

Financials

LRCX vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab