PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LRCX vs. ASML
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LRCXASML
YTD Return15.64%21.65%
1Y Return73.30%42.89%
3Y Return (Ann)15.86%13.44%
5Y Return (Ann)37.82%36.86%
10Y Return (Ann)33.50%28.75%
Sharpe Ratio2.161.28
Daily Std Dev33.95%33.12%
Max Drawdown-87.91%-90.00%
Current Drawdown-8.93%-12.24%

Fundamentals


LRCXASML
Market Cap$119.68B$367.08B
EPS$27.19$19.44
PE Ratio33.6747.85
PEG Ratio2.722.81
Revenue (TTM)$14.24B$26.10B
Gross Profit (TTM)$7.87B$10.70B
EBITDA (TTM)$4.42B$8.93B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between LRCX and ASML is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LRCX vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 15.64% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 21.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 33.50%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 28.75% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


10,000.00%20,000.00%30,000.00%40,000.00%50,000.00%60,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7,410.80%
49,416.30%
LRCX
ASML

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lam Research Corporation

ASML Holding N.V.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LRCX vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LRCX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.002.16
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 2.76, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.76
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 10.46, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0010.46
ASML
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ASML, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.001.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ASML, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ASML, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ASML, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.23
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ASML, currently valued at 3.77, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.77

LRCX vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LRCX and ASML.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.16
1.28
LRCX
ASML

Dividends

LRCX vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than ASML's 0.71% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.85%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%0.68%0.00%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.71%0.85%1.27%0.50%0.59%1.20%1.10%0.75%1.02%0.91%0.78%0.75%

Drawdowns

LRCX vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and ASML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.93%
-12.24%
LRCX
ASML

Volatility

LRCX vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is 10.25%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 12.29%. This indicates that LRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10.25%
12.29%
LRCX
ASML

Financials

LRCX vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items