LRCX vs. MU
LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LRCX in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, MU in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, LRCX returned 49.82%/yr vs 57.52%/yr for MU. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LRCX vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 139.70% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 324.61% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 49.82%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 57.52% annualized return.
LRCX
- 1D
- 5.27%
- 1M
- 34.22%
- YTD
- 139.70%
- 6M
- 134.12%
- 1Y
- 355.09%
- 3Y*
- 90.48%
- 5Y*
- 47.20%
- 10Y*
- 49.82%
MU
- 1D
- 6.82%
- 1M
- 61.30%
- YTD
- 324.61%
- 6M
- 338.33%
- 1Y
- 882.43%
- 3Y*
- 165.88%
- 5Y*
- 73.49%
- 10Y*
- 57.52%
LRCX vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 139.70% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 324.61% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCX and MU is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.53 |
The correlation between LRCX and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LRCX:
$517.16B
MU:
$1.38T
LRCX:
$5.29
MU:
$21.26
LRCX:
77.45
MU:
56.99
LRCX:
5.86
MU:
0.21
LRCX:
23.96
MU:
23.64
LRCX:
48.86
MU:
19.06
LRCX:
$21.68B
MU:
$58.12B
LRCX:
$10.84B
MU:
$33.96B
LRCX:
$6.10B
MU:
$25.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCX vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
LRCX
MU
LRCX vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCX | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.82 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.89 | 29.44 | -11.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 59.91 | 111.67 | -51.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCX vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCX | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.90% | -98.25% | +10.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.01% | -30.28% | +10.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.10% | -57.63% | +10.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.39% | -57.63% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.39% | -57.63% | +1.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.15% | -58.13% | +29.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 7.97% | -2.01% |
Volatility
LRCX vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is 21.36%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 33.47%. This indicates that LRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCX | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.36% | 33.47% | -12.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.86% | 58.69% | -14.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.48% | 71.47% | -17.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.78% | 53.67% | -6.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.05% | 50.30% | -5.25% |
Dividends
LRCX vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, more than MU's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.25% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.04% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LRCX vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LRCX vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCX and MU have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (33.47%) compared to LRCX (21.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.50 vs 6.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRCX and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer