LOHA vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

LOHA (Roundhill HALO ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOHA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Akros U.S. Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence (HALO) Index, while MEME is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. LOHA is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOHA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

LOHA vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LOHA

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 2.99%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -18.82%
• YTD: 48.23%
• 6M: 37.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOHA vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LOHA Roundhill HALO ETF	2.99%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	-10.95%

Correlation

The correlation between LOHA and MEME is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2026	0.19

Return for Risk

LOHA vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

LOHA vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOHA drawdown since its inception was -2.48%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOHA and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOHA	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	-48.78%	+46.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-22.12%	+22.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.90%	-28.55%	+27.65%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LOHA	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.09%	75.33%	-60.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.09%	75.33%	-60.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.09%	75.33%	-60.24%

LOHA vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOHA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOHA vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOHA nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOHA and MEME in my portfolio?

LOHA and MEME have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LOHA or MEME?

On fees, LOHA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOHA or MEME?

LOHA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOHA or MEME?

LOHA and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LOHA and MEME?

LOHA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MEME is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LOHA and 0.69% for MEME.