LOHA vs. NVDW
LOHA (Roundhill HALO ETF) and NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOHA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Akros U.S. Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence (HALO) Index, while NVDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. LOHA is passively managed, while NVDW is actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOHA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVDW.
Performance
LOHA vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LOHA
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDW
- 1D
- -6.93%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 13.06%
- 1Y
- 50.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOHA vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LOHA Roundhill HALO ETF | -0.44% |
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | -15.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOHA and NVDW is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2026 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOHA vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank
LOHA
NVDW
LOHA vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOHA | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | 1.29 | -1.91 |
Drawdowns
LOHA vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOHA drawdown since its inception was -2.08%, smaller than the maximum NVDW drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOHA and NVDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOHA | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -25.54% | +23.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -15.17% | +13.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -8.22% | +7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.55% | — |
Volatility
LOHA vs. NVDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOHA | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 41.68% | -29.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 41.64% | -29.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 41.64% | -29.80% |
LOHA vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOHA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOHA vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison
LOHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LOHA Roundhill HALO ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 61.25% | 38.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOHA and NVDW have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOHA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOHA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDW.
NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 61.25%, compared with 0.00% for LOHA.
LOHA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while NVDW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LOHA and 0.99% for NVDW.
Find the right allocation for LOHA and NVDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer