PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOHA vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOHA vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LOHA

1D
-0.59%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFX

1D
-0.59%
1M
0.48%
YTD
3.65%
6M
4.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOHA vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LOHA and BUFX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2026

0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOHA vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LOHA vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOHABUFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.62

2.51

-3.13

Drawdowns

LOHA vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOHA drawdown since its inception was -2.08%, smaller than the maximum BUFX drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOHA and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOHABUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-2.87%

+0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-0.59%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.81%

-0.24%

-0.57%

Volatility

LOHA vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOHABUFXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

4.02%

+7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.84%

4.02%

+7.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.84%

4.02%

+7.82%

LOHA vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOHA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOHA vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOHA nor BUFX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LOHA and BUFX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LOHA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LOHA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

LOHA and BUFX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

LOHA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LOHA and 0.96% for BUFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOHA and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer