LOHA vs. FTIF
LOHA (Roundhill HALO ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - LOHA tracks the Akros U.S. Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence (HALO) Index while FTIF tracks the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOHA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.
Performance
LOHA vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LOHA
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTIF
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 22.76%
- 6M
- 21.08%
- 1Y
- 34.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOHA vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LOHA Roundhill HALO ETF | -0.44% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | -1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOHA and FTIF is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOHA vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank
LOHA
FTIF
LOHA vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HALO ETF (LOHA) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOHA | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | 0.70 | -1.33 |
Drawdowns
LOHA vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOHA drawdown since its inception was -2.08%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOHA and FTIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOHA | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -27.83% | +25.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -2.91% | +1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -5.99% | +5.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.85% | — |
Volatility
LOHA vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOHA | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 15.17% | -3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 18.99% | -7.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 18.99% | -7.15% |
LOHA vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOHA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOHA vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison
LOHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.14% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% |
LOHA Roundhill HALO ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOHA and FTIF have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOHA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOHA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.
FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.00% for LOHA.
LOHA tracks Akros U.S. Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence (HALO) Index, while FTIF tracks Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LOHA and 0.60% for FTIF.
Find the right allocation for LOHA and FTIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer