PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNG vs. NBIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LNG vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 22.32% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 160.44% return.


LNG

1D
-0.93%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
22.32%
6M
18.42%
1Y
-1.71%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
22.98%
10Y*
21.91%

NBIS

1D
-4.31%
1M
23.13%
YTD
160.44%
6M
117.28%
1Y
351.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNG vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
22.32%-8.70%18.23%
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
160.44%202.18%46.25%

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and NBIS is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024

0.09

The correlation between LNG and NBIS shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNG:

$49.81B

NBIS:

$67.36B

EPS

LNG:

$6.80

NBIS:

$3.17

PE Ratio

LNG:

34.79

NBIS:

68.67

PEG Ratio

LNG:

0.19

NBIS:

23.59

PS Ratio

LNG:

2.53

NBIS:

65.42

PB Ratio

LNG:

13.26

NBIS:

9.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNG:

$20.28B

NBIS:

$877.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNG:

$5.52B

NBIS:

$420.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

LNG:

$5.81B

NBIS:

-$52.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNG vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG
LNG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

NBIS
NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNG vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LNGNBISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.41

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

7.79

-7.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.15

17.86

-18.01

LNG vs. NBIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the NBIS Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and NBIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LNGNBISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

3.39

-3.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

3.19

-3.03

Drawdowns

LNG vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and NBIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNGNBISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.84%

-58.27%

-39.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.09%

-45.47%

+21.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.12%

-17.58%

-2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.16%

-19.02%

-24.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.67%

19.79%

-8.12%

Volatility

LNG vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 7.91%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 33.60%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNGNBISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

33.60%

-25.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.87%

71.53%

-49.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.75%

104.78%

-77.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.28%

110.72%

-80.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.59%

110.72%

-78.13%

Dividends

LNG vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while NBIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.92%1.06%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LNG vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
5.87B
399.00M
(LNG) Total Revenue
(NBIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LNG and NBIS have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIS has higher volatility (33.60%) compared to LNG (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs NBIS's -58.27%.

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNG and NBIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer