LMB vs. PLMR
LMB (Limbach Holdings, Inc.) and PLMR (Palomar Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. LMB operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while PLMR operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, LMB returned 52.40%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for PLMR. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LMB vs. PLMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMB achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than PLMR's -14.77% return.
LMB
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- 10.25%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- -44.24%
- 3Y*
- 50.98%
- 5Y*
- 52.40%
- 10Y*
- 22.55%
PLMR
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 6.19%
- YTD
- -14.77%
- 6M
- -9.27%
- 1Y
- -28.70%
- 3Y*
- 25.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
LMB vs. PLMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. | 1.59% | -8.99% | 88.12% | 336.79% | 15.67% | -27.01% | 226.19% | -56.20% |
PLMR Palomar Holdings, Inc. | -14.77% | 27.63% | 90.25% | 22.90% | -30.28% | -27.09% | 75.96% | 172.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMB and PLMR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
LMB:
$954.43M
PLMR:
$3.14B
LMB:
$2.75
PLMR:
$7.18
LMB:
28.80
PLMR:
15.99
LMB:
0.40
PLMR:
0.37
LMB:
1.47
PLMR:
3.22
LMB:
4.86
PLMR:
3.27
LMB:
$652.56M
PLMR:
$977.99M
LMB:
$163.77M
PLMR:
$401.29M
LMB:
$58.72M
PLMR:
$210.26M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMB vs. PLMR — Risk / Return Rank
LMB
PLMR
LMB vs. PLMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMB | PLMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.88 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.77 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | -1.19 | +0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMB vs. PLMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMB drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, which is greater than PLMR's maximum drawdown of -62.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMB and PLMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMB | PLMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.10% | -62.86% | -21.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.92% | -37.51% | -18.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.92% | -42.27% | -13.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.92% | -53.81% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.11% | -34.62% | -12.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -28.81% | -2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.98% | 24.17% | +14.81% |
Volatility
LMB vs. PLMR - Volatility Comparison
Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a higher volatility of 18.28% compared to Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) at 11.03%. This indicates that LMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMB | PLMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.28% | 11.03% | +7.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.99% | 23.78% | +33.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.31% | 36.57% | +29.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.70% | 42.68% | +20.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.28% | 47.88% | +15.40% |
Dividends
LMB vs. PLMR - Dividend Comparison
Neither LMB nor PLMR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LMB vs. PLMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Limbach Holdings, Inc. and Palomar Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LMB vs. PLMR - Profitability Comparison
LMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.17M and revenue of 138.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.
PLMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.13M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
PLMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
LMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 4.38M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
PLMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 42.95M and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LMB and PLMR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMB has higher volatility (18.28%) compared to PLMR (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMB dropped -84.10% vs PLMR's -62.86%.
LMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMB and PLMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer