PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LMB vs. GVA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LMBGVA
YTD Return100.70%91.36%
1Y Return136.73%109.51%
3Y Return (Ann)127.03%33.59%
5Y Return (Ann)97.89%31.24%
10Y Return (Ann)29.07%11.91%
Sharpe Ratio2.825.00
Sortino Ratio3.186.28
Omega Ratio1.411.74
Calmar Ratio6.394.19
Martin Ratio16.5426.90
Ulcer Index9.57%4.36%
Daily Std Dev56.02%23.47%
Max Drawdown-84.10%-84.72%
Current Drawdown-5.86%-1.70%

Fundamentals


LMBGVA
Market Cap$1.05B$4.25B
EPS$2.18$2.36
PE Ratio42.8341.20
PEG Ratio2.515.56
Total Revenue (TTM)$517.82M$3.96B
Gross Profit (TTM)$131.10M$516.26M
EBITDA (TTM)$42.47M$242.12M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between LMB and GVA is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LMB vs. GVA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LMB achieves a 100.70% return, which is significantly higher than GVA's 91.36% return. Over the past 10 years, LMB has outperformed GVA with an annualized return of 29.07%, while GVA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.91% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
88.71%
57.66%
LMB
GVA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LMB vs. GVA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LMB, currently valued at 2.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.82
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LMB, currently valued at 3.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.18
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LMB, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LMB, currently valued at 6.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LMB, currently valued at 16.54, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0016.54
GVA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GVA, currently valued at 5.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.005.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GVA, currently valued at 6.28, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.006.28
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GVA, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.74
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GVA, currently valued at 4.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GVA, currently valued at 26.90, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0026.90

LMB vs. GVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is lower than the GVA Sharpe Ratio of 5.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMB and GVA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.82
5.00
LMB
GVA

Dividends

LMB vs. GVA - Dividend Comparison

LMB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LMB
Limbach Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GVA
Granite Construction Incorporated
0.54%1.02%1.48%1.34%1.95%1.88%1.29%0.82%0.95%1.21%1.37%1.49%

Drawdowns

LMB vs. GVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMB drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, roughly equal to the maximum GVA drawdown of -84.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMB and GVA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.86%
-1.70%
LMB
GVA

Volatility

LMB vs. GVA - Volatility Comparison

Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a higher volatility of 22.09% compared to Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) at 7.42%. This indicates that LMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
22.09%
7.42%
LMB
GVA

Financials

LMB vs. GVA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Limbach Holdings, Inc. and Granite Construction Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items