LMB vs. VRNS

In the year-to-date period, LMB achieves a 97.40% return, which is significantly higher than VRNS's 0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, LMB has outperformed VRNS with an annualized return of 28.48%, while VRNS has yielded a comparatively lower 15.58% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Varonis Systems, Inc. (VRNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the VRNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMB and VRNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LMB nor VRNS has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LMB drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, which is greater than VRNS's maximum drawdown of -78.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMB and VRNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a higher volatility of 12.25% compared to Varonis Systems, Inc. (VRNS) at 5.65%. This indicates that LMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Limbach Holdings, Inc. and Varonis Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.