PLMR vs. CHWY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PLMR (Palomar Holdings, Inc.) and CHWY (Chewy, Inc.) are both stocks. PLMR operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while CHWY operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, PLMR returned 6.92%/yr vs -22.49%/yr for CHWY. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PLMR vs. CHWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) and Chewy, Inc. (CHWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLMR achieves a -24.74% return, which is significantly higher than CHWY's -36.34% return.

PLMR

• 1D: -3.11%
• 1M: -12.23%
• YTD: -24.74%
• 6M: -14.04%
• 1Y: -42.08%
• 3Y*: 23.25%
• 5Y*: 6.92%
• 10Y*: —

CHWY

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: -14.33%
• YTD: -36.34%
• 6M: -38.03%
• 1Y: -55.82%
• 3Y*: -16.01%
• 5Y*: -22.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLMR vs. CHWY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PLMR Palomar Holdings, Inc.	-24.74%	27.63%	90.25%	22.90%	-30.28%	-27.09%	75.96%	104.41%
CHWY Chewy, Inc.	-36.34%	-1.31%	41.73%	-36.27%	-37.12%	-34.40%	209.97%	-17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PLMR and CHWY is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2019	0.20

The correlation between PLMR and CHWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap PLMR : $2.77B CHWY : $8.92B
EPS PLMR : $7.18 CHWY : $0.00
PE Ratio PLMR : 14.12 CHWY : 40.23K
PEG Ratio PLMR : 0.32 CHWY : 143.25
PS Ratio PLMR : 2.85 CHWY : 0.96
PB Ratio PLMR : 2.89 CHWY : 17.92K
Total Revenue (TTM) PLMR : $977.99M CHWY : $9.34B
Gross Profit (TTM) PLMR : $401.29M CHWY : $2.80B
EBITDA (TTM) PLMR : $210.26M CHWY : $189.94M

Return for Risk

PLMR vs. CHWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLMR

PLMR Risk / Return Rank: 3
PLMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
PLMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
PLMR Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PLMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
PLMR Martin Ratio Rank: 5

CHWY

CHWY Risk / Return Rank: 3
CHWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CHWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CHWY Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CHWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CHWY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLMR vs. CHWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) and Chewy, Inc. (CHWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLMR	CHWY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.17	-1.21	+0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.69	-1.99	+0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	0.76	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.03	-0.95	-0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.53	-1.61	+0.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLMR vs. CHWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLMR Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is comparable to the CHWY Sharpe Ratio of -1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLMR and CHWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLMR	CHWY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.17	-1.21	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	-0.37	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	-0.12	+0.67

Drawdowns

PLMR vs. CHWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLMR drawdown since its inception was -62.86%, smaller than the maximum CHWY drawdown of -87.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLMR and CHWY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLMR	CHWY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.86%	-87.37%	+24.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.96%	-59.22%	+18.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.27%	-63.01%	+20.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.81%	-84.34%	+30.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.27%	-82.27%	+40.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.80%	-54.09%	+25.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.84%	34.63%	-5.79%

Volatility

PLMR vs. CHWY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) is 9.65%, while Chewy, Inc. (CHWY) has a volatility of 15.35%. This indicates that PLMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLMR	CHWY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.65%	15.35%	-5.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.20%	34.31%	-11.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.07%	46.27%	-10.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.60%	60.58%	-17.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.91%	61.21%	-13.30%

Dividends

PLMR vs. CHWY - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLMR nor CHWY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLMR and CHWY in my portfolio?

PLMR and CHWY have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLMR or CHWY?

CHWY has higher volatility (15.35%) compared to PLMR (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLMR dropped -62.86% vs CHWY's -87.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.17 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.