LMB vs. BELFB
LMB (Limbach Holdings, Inc.) and BELFB (Bel Fuse Inc.) are both stocks. LMB operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while BELFB operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, LMB returned 22.83%/yr vs 31.08%/yr for BELFB. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LMB vs. BELFB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMB achieves a -7.90% return, which is significantly lower than BELFB's 60.48% return. Over the past 10 years, LMB has underperformed BELFB with an annualized return of 22.83%, while BELFB has yielded a comparatively higher 31.08% annualized return.
LMB
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- 6M
- -16.61%
- YTD
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- -46.28%
- 3Y*
- 37.90%
- 5Y*
- 51.72%
- 10Y*
- 22.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.76%
BELFB
- 1D
- 7.32%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 35.25%
- YTD
- 60.48%
- 1Y
- 113.61%
- 3Y*
- 72.95%
- 5Y*
- 83.29%
- 10Y*
- 31.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | $80.85M | $82.65M | $89.41M |
| $12.69M | $13.00M | $22.33M |
LMB vs. BELFB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. | -7.90% | -8.99% | 88.12% | 336.79% | 15.67% | -27.01% | 226.19% | 2.72% | -73.39% | -1.91% |
BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | 60.48% | 106.32% | 24.03% | 104.19% | 158.73% | -12.33% | -24.84% | 13.09% | -25.89% | -17.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMB and BELFB is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2016 | 0.20 |
The correlation between LMB and BELFB shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.37 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LMB:
$854.74M
BELFB:
$3.29B
LMB:
$2.75
BELFB:
$5.45
LMB:
26.10
BELFB:
49.92
LMB:
0.36
BELFB:
1.21
LMB:
1.33
BELFB:
3.60
LMB:
4.41
BELFB:
0.46
LMB:
$652.56M
BELFB:
$744.09M
LMB:
$163.77M
BELFB:
$294.08M
LMB:
$58.72M
BELFB:
$100.21M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMB vs. BELFB — Risk / Return Rank
LMB
BELFB
LMB vs. BELFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMB | BELFB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.32 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 4.05 | -4.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 12.45 | -13.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMB vs. BELFB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMB drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, roughly equal to the maximum BELFB drawdown of -81.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMB and BELFB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMB | BELFB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.10% | -81.89% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.11% | -27.19% | -23.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.92% | -33.37% | -22.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.92% | -36.49% | -19.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.10% | -79.79% | -4.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.05% | -18.32% | -33.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.84% | -36.74% | +4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.78% | 8.82% | +28.96% |
Volatility
LMB vs. BELFB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) is 13.96%, while Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) has a volatility of 26.84%. This indicates that LMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BELFB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMB | BELFB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.96% | 26.84% | -12.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.28% | 44.77% | +11.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.37% | 52.67% | +12.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.93% | 52.01% | +10.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.78% | 58.89% | +3.89% |
Dividends
LMB vs. BELFB - Dividend Comparison
LMB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BELFB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | 0.10% | 0.17% | 0.34% | 0.42% | 0.85% | 2.17% | 1.86% | 1.37% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 0.91% | 1.62% |
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LMB vs. BELFB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Limbach Holdings, Inc. and Bel Fuse Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LMB vs. BELFB - Profitability Comparison
LMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.17M and revenue of 138.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.
BELFB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported a gross profit of 83.97M and revenue of 210.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.
LMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.13M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
BELFB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported an operating income of 37.72M and revenue of 210.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
LMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 4.38M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
BELFB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bel Fuse Inc. reported a net income of 25.48M and revenue of 210.69M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LMB and BELFB have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BELFB has higher volatility (26.84%) compared to LMB (13.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMB dropped -84.10% vs BELFB's -81.89%.
BELFB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMB and BELFB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer