PLMR vs. CRWD
PLMR (Palomar Holdings, Inc.) and CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. PLMR operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while CRWD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, PLMR returned 10.44%/yr vs 24.66%/yr for CRWD. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PLMR vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLMR achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 62.86% return.
PLMR
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- 6M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- 30.53%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.19%
CRWD
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 72.96%
- YTD
- 62.86%
- 1Y
- 70.92%
- 3Y*
- 66.31%
- 5Y*
- 24.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 41.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.40B | $1.60B | $2.05B | |
| $32.50M | $42.62M | $37.16M |
PLMR vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLMR Palomar Holdings, Inc. | -0.72% | 27.63% | 90.25% | 22.90% | -30.28% | -27.09% | 75.96% | 117.54% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 62.86% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -21.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLMR and CRWD is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PLMR and CRWD has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
PLMR:
$3.55B
CRWD:
$194.34B
PLMR:
$7.19
CRWD:
-$0.02
PLMR:
3.75
CRWD:
9.58
PLMR:
3.81
CRWD:
10.62
PLMR:
$977.99M
CRWD:
$5.09B
PLMR:
$401.29M
CRWD:
$3.82B
PLMR:
$210.26M
CRWD:
$246.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLMR vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank
PLMR
CRWD
PLMR vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLMR | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.26 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 1.84 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | 4.40 | -4.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLMR vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLMR drawdown since its inception was -62.86%, smaller than the maximum CRWD drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLMR and CRWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLMR | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.86% | -67.69% | +4.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.14% | -37.18% | +11.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.27% | -44.44% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.81% | -67.69% | +13.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.84% | -9.43% | -14.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.75% | -23.33% | -5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.19% | 15.49% | -4.30% |
Volatility
PLMR vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) is 14.09%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 16.39%. This indicates that PLMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLMR | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.09% | 16.39% | -2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.13% | 39.70% | -12.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.46% | 47.78% | -9.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.04% | 51.09% | -8.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.89% | 55.97% | -8.08% |
Dividends
PLMR vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLMR nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PLMR vs. CRWD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palomar Holdings, Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PLMR vs. CRWD - Profitability Comparison
PLMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CRWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.
PLMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CRWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.60M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
PLMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 42.95M and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
CRWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.97M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLMR and CRWD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWD has higher volatility (16.39%) compared to PLMR (14.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLMR dropped -62.86% vs CRWD's -67.69%.
CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLMR and CRWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer