LMB vs. VATE
LMB (Limbach Holdings, Inc.) and VATE (INNOVATE Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, LMB returned 23.16%/yr vs -4.76%/yr for VATE. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LMB vs. VATE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMB achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than VATE's 255.31% return. Over the past 10 years, LMB has outperformed VATE with an annualized return of 23.16%, while VATE has yielded a comparatively lower -4.76% annualized return.
LMB
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -19.17%
- YTD
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 16.60%
- 1Y
- -39.80%
- 3Y*
- 55.04%
- 5Y*
- 53.88%
- 10Y*
- 23.16%
VATE
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 36.10%
- YTD
- 255.31%
- 6M
- 221.20%
- 1Y
- 194.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.19%
- 5Y*
- -17.88%
- 10Y*
- -4.76%
LMB vs. VATE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. | 2.97% | -8.99% | 88.12% | 336.79% | 15.67% | -27.01% | 226.19% | 2.72% | -73.39% | -1.91% |
VATE INNOVATE Corp. | 255.31% | -8.50% | -59.84% | -34.22% | -49.46% | 13.50% | 50.23% | -17.80% | -55.63% | 63.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMB and VATE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2016 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
LMB:
$967.34M
VATE:
$214.32M
LMB:
$2.75
VATE:
-$4.02
LMB:
1.49
VATE:
0.16
LMB:
4.93
VATE:
164.86
LMB:
$652.56M
VATE:
$1.34B
LMB:
$163.77M
VATE:
$190.20M
LMB:
$58.72M
VATE:
$5.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMB vs. VATE — Risk / Return Rank
LMB
VATE
LMB vs. VATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and INNOVATE Corp. (VATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMB | VATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | 2.44 | -3.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | 3.02 | -3.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.37 | -0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 5.37 | -6.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 12.55 | -13.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMB | VATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 | 2.44 | -3.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | -0.19 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | -0.06 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.09 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
LMB vs. VATE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMB drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, smaller than the maximum VATE drawdown of -95.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMB and VATE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMB | VATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.10% | -95.92% | +11.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.92% | -33.11% | -22.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.92% | -83.35% | +27.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.92% | -92.99% | +37.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.10% | -95.36% | +11.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.39% | -80.02% | +33.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.60% | -46.08% | +14.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.11% | 14.17% | +23.94% |
Volatility
LMB vs. VATE - Volatility Comparison
Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a higher volatility of 45.01% compared to INNOVATE Corp. (VATE) at 29.71%. This indicates that LMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VATE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMB | VATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 45.01% | 29.71% | +15.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.25% | 60.74% | -4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.61% | 80.49% | -14.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.60% | 93.73% | -31.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.22% | 82.05% | -18.83% |
Dividends
LMB vs. VATE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LMB nor VATE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VATE INNOVATE Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 43.53% |
Financials
LMB vs. VATE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Limbach Holdings, Inc. and INNOVATE Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LMB vs. VATE - Profitability Comparison
LMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.17M and revenue of 138.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.
VATE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, INNOVATE Corp. reported a gross profit of 53.50M and revenue of 364.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.7%.
LMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.13M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
VATE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, INNOVATE Corp. reported an operating income of -100.00K and revenue of 364.80M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.0%.
LMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 4.38M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
VATE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, INNOVATE Corp. reported a net income of -17.20M and revenue of 364.80M, resulting in a net margin of -4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LMB and VATE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMB has higher volatility (45.01%) compared to VATE (29.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMB dropped -84.10% vs VATE's -95.92%.
VATE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMB and VATE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer