LMB vs. BBW
LMB (Limbach Holdings, Inc.) and BBW (Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.) are both stocks. LMB operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while BBW operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, LMB returned 22.83%/yr vs 12.01%/yr for BBW. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LMB vs. BBW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMB achieves a -7.90% return, which is significantly higher than BBW's -43.92% return. Over the past 10 years, LMB has outperformed BBW with an annualized return of 22.83%, while BBW has yielded a comparatively lower 12.01% annualized return.
LMB
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- 6M
- -16.61%
- YTD
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- -46.28%
- 3Y*
- 37.90%
- 5Y*
- 51.72%
- 10Y*
- 22.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.76%
BBW
- 1D
- -3.83%
- 1M
- 7.68%
- 6M
- -42.43%
- YTD
- -43.92%
- 1Y
- -29.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 21.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.11M | $10.86M | $12.86M | |
| $12.69M | $13.00M | $22.33M |
LMB vs. BBW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. | -7.90% | -8.99% | 88.12% | 336.79% | 15.67% | -27.01% | 226.19% | 2.72% | -73.39% | -1.91% |
BBW Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. | -43.92% | 35.39% | 105.62% | 2.79% | 22.13% | 385.45% | 31.79% | -17.97% | -57.07% | -33.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMB and BBW is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2016 | 0.14 |
The correlation between LMB and BBW shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LMB:
$854.74M
BBW:
$425.27M
LMB:
$2.75
BBW:
$4.25
LMB:
26.10
BBW:
7.98
LMB:
0.36
BBW:
1.14
LMB:
1.33
BBW:
0.84
LMB:
4.41
BBW:
2.70
LMB:
$652.56M
BBW:
$526.71M
LMB:
$163.77M
BBW:
$302.52M
LMB:
$58.72M
BBW:
$82.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMB vs. BBW — Risk / Return Rank
LMB
BBW
LMB vs. BBW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMB | BBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.92 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.53 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | -0.85 | -0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMB vs. BBW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMB drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, smaller than the maximum BBW drawdown of -97.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMB and BBW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMB | BBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.10% | -97.24% | +13.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.11% | -59.86% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.92% | -59.86% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.92% | -59.86% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.10% | -93.40% | +9.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.05% | -54.37% | +2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.84% | -59.67% | +27.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.78% | 37.53% | +0.25% |
Volatility
LMB vs. BBW - Volatility Comparison
Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) have volatilities of 13.96% and 14.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMB | BBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.96% | 14.50% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.28% | 32.09% | +24.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.37% | 51.89% | +13.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.93% | 55.31% | +7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.78% | 65.99% | -3.21% |
Dividends
LMB vs. BBW - Dividend Comparison
LMB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBW Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. | 2.65% | 1.44% | 1.74% | 6.52% | 0.00% | 6.40% |
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LMB vs. BBW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Limbach Holdings, Inc. and Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LMB vs. BBW - Profitability Comparison
LMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.17M and revenue of 138.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.
BBW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.87M and revenue of 125.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.
LMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.13M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
BBW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.75M and revenue of 125.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
LMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 4.38M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
BBW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported a net income of 18.30M and revenue of 125.27M, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LMB and BBW have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBW has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to LMB (13.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMB dropped -84.10% vs BBW's -97.24%.
BBW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMB and BBW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer