LMB vs. BBW

In the year-to-date period, LMB achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly higher than BBW's -24.22% return. Over the past 10 years, LMB has outperformed BBW with an annualized return of 27.91%, while BBW has yielded a comparatively lower 8.23% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the BBW Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMB and BBW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LMB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%.

The maximum LMB drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, smaller than the maximum BBW drawdown of -97.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMB and BBW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) is 17.82%, while Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) has a volatility of 27.22%. This indicates that LMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Limbach Holdings, Inc. and Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.