PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMB vs. HRTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LMB vs. HRTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMB achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than HRTG's -23.27% return. Over the past 10 years, LMB has outperformed HRTG with an annualized return of 22.55%, while HRTG has yielded a comparatively lower 7.50% annualized return.


LMB

1D
-2.80%
1M
10.25%
YTD
1.59%
6M
4.13%
1Y
-44.24%
3Y*
50.98%
5Y*
52.40%
10Y*
22.55%

HRTG

1D
0.58%
1M
1.95%
YTD
-23.27%
6M
-22.80%
1Y
-5.99%
3Y*
71.00%
5Y*
22.01%
10Y*
7.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMB vs. HRTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMB
Limbach Holdings, Inc.
1.59%-8.99%88.12%336.79%15.67%-27.01%226.19%2.72%-73.39%-1.91%
HRTG
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
-23.27%141.82%85.58%262.22%-68.58%-40.09%-21.80%-8.50%-17.06%16.94%

Correlation

The correlation between LMB and HRTG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2016

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LMB:

$954.43M

HRTG:

$690.12M

EPS

LMB:

$2.75

HRTG:

$6.53

PE Ratio

LMB:

28.80

HRTG:

3.44

PEG Ratio

LMB:

0.40

HRTG:

0.02

PS Ratio

LMB:

1.47

HRTG:

0.82

PB Ratio

LMB:

4.86

HRTG:

1.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

LMB:

$652.56M

HRTG:

$848.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LMB:

$163.77M

HRTG:

$333.64M

EBITDA (TTM)

LMB:

$58.72M

HRTG:

$285.21M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMB vs. HRTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMB
LMB Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMB Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
LMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMB Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

HRTG
HRTG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HRTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRTG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HRTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMB vs. HRTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMBHRTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.03

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.18

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

-0.40

-0.73

LMB vs. HRTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMB Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the HRTG Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMB and HRTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMB vs. HRTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMB drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, smaller than the maximum HRTG drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMB and HRTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMBHRTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.10%

-94.36%

+10.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.92%

-32.95%

-22.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.92%

-43.90%

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.92%

-84.89%

+28.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.10%

-92.21%

+8.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.11%

-27.91%

-19.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.63%

-46.51%

+14.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.98%

14.92%

+24.06%

Volatility

LMB vs. HRTG - Volatility Comparison

Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a higher volatility of 18.28% compared to Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) at 10.07%. This indicates that LMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HRTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMBHRTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.28%

10.07%

+8.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.99%

37.66%

+19.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.31%

57.07%

+9.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.70%

71.35%

-8.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.28%

57.93%

+5.35%

Dividends

LMB vs. HRTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither LMB nor HRTG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRTG
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.67%4.08%2.37%1.81%1.63%1.33%1.47%0.23%
LMB
Limbach Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LMB vs. HRTG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Limbach Holdings, Inc. and Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


120.00M140.00M160.00M180.00M200.00M220.00M20222023202420252026
138.86M
212.66M
(LMB) Total Revenue
(HRTG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LMB vs. HRTG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Limbach Holdings, Inc. and Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
22.5%
0
Portfolio components
LMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.17M and revenue of 138.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.

HRTG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 212.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.13M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.

HRTG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.82M and revenue of 212.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

LMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 4.38M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.

HRTG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 36.48M and revenue of 212.66M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LMB and HRTG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMB has higher volatility (18.28%) compared to HRTG (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMB dropped -84.10% vs HRTG's -94.36%.

HRTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMB and HRTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer