LKQ vs. GSID
LKQ (LKQ Corporation) is a stock, while GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index. Over the past 5 years, LKQ returned -9.79%/yr vs 8.97%/yr for GSID. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LKQ vs. GSID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LKQ achieves a -14.04% return, which is significantly lower than GSID's 10.66% return.
LKQ
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -6.41%
- YTD
- -14.04%
- 6M
- -14.11%
- 1Y
- -28.69%
- 3Y*
- -19.92%
- 5Y*
- -9.79%
- 10Y*
- -0.71%
GSID
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 25.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- —
LKQ vs. GSID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LKQ LKQ Corporation | -14.04% | -14.99% | -20.92% | -8.56% | -9.24% | 71.09% | 49.70% |
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 10.66% | 31.77% | 3.60% | 17.63% | -14.77% | 10.67% | 35.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between LKQ and GSID is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.52 |
The correlation between LKQ and GSID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LKQ vs. GSID — Risk / Return Rank
LKQ
GSID
LKQ vs. GSID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKQ Corporation (LKQ) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LKQ | GSID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.30 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 2.29 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 8.49 | -9.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LKQ vs. GSID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LKQ drawdown since its inception was -68.02%, which is greater than GSID's maximum drawdown of -29.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKQ and GSID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LKQ | GSID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.02% | -29.89% | -38.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.54% | -11.34% | -24.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.80% | -13.96% | -40.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.80% | -29.89% | -24.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.64% | -0.03% | -52.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -5.69% | -10.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.87% | 3.05% | +17.82% |
Volatility
LKQ vs. GSID - Volatility Comparison
LKQ Corporation (LKQ) has a higher volatility of 9.63% compared to Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) at 4.79%. This indicates that LKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LKQ | GSID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.63% | 4.79% | +4.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.00% | 13.15% | +10.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.79% | 15.55% | +20.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.00% | 16.31% | +13.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.85% | 16.33% | +17.52% |
Dividends
LKQ vs. GSID - Dividend Comparison
LKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than GSID's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.90% | 2.59% | 2.57% | 2.93% | 1.02% |
LKQ LKQ Corporation | 4.72% | 3.97% | 3.27% | 2.35% | 1.92% | 0.42% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LKQ and GSID have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LKQ has higher volatility (9.63%) compared to GSID (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKQ dropped -68.02% vs GSID's -29.89%.
GSID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LKQ and GSID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer