LKQ vs. GSID
LKQ (LKQ Corporation) is a stock, while GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index. Over the past 5 years, LKQ returned -10.74%/yr vs 8.81%/yr for GSID. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LKQ vs. GSID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LKQ achieves a -14.14% return, which is significantly lower than GSID's 10.61% return.
LKQ
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -3.13%
- 6M
- -22.37%
- YTD
- -14.14%
- 1Y
- -31.49%
- 3Y*
- -21.64%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- -1.44%
GSID
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 21.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.81%
- 10Y*
- —
LKQ vs. GSID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LKQ LKQ Corporation | -14.14% | -14.99% | -20.92% | -8.56% | -9.24% | 71.09% | 49.70% |
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 10.61% | 31.77% | 3.60% | 17.63% | -14.77% | 10.67% | 35.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between LKQ and GSID is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.52 |
The correlation between LKQ and GSID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LKQ vs. GSID — Risk / Return Rank
LKQ
GSID
LKQ vs. GSID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKQ Corporation (LKQ) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LKQ | GSID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.24 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 1.84 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | 6.81 | -8.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LKQ vs. GSID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LKQ drawdown since its inception was -68.02%, which is greater than GSID's maximum drawdown of -29.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKQ and GSID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LKQ | GSID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.02% | -29.89% | -38.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.54% | -11.34% | -23.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.50% | -13.96% | -40.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.80% | -29.89% | -24.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.70% | -0.81% | -51.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.14% | -5.65% | -10.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.00% | 3.06% | +18.94% |
Volatility
LKQ vs. GSID - Volatility Comparison
LKQ Corporation (LKQ) has a higher volatility of 9.62% compared to Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) at 4.60%. This indicates that LKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LKQ | GSID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.62% | 4.60% | +5.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.43% | 13.41% | +11.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.14% | 15.63% | +20.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.04% | 16.31% | +13.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.72% | 16.31% | +17.41% |
Dividends
LKQ vs. GSID - Dividend Comparison
LKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than GSID's 2.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 2.46% | 2.64% | 2.90% | 2.59% | 2.57% | 2.93% | 1.02% |
LKQ LKQ Corporation | 4.73% | 3.97% | 3.27% | 2.35% | 1.92% | 0.42% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LKQ and GSID have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LKQ has higher volatility (9.62%) compared to GSID (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKQ dropped -68.02% vs GSID's -29.89%.
GSID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LKQ and GSID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer