PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKQ vs. MGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LKQ vs. MGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKQ Corporation (LKQ) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKQ achieves a -14.04% return, which is significantly lower than MGM's 29.46% return. Over the past 10 years, LKQ has underperformed MGM with an annualized return of -1.34%, while MGM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.92% annualized return.


LKQ

1D
0.12%
1M
-3.02%
6M
-21.81%
YTD
-14.04%
1Y
-31.41%
3Y*
-21.69%
5Y*
-10.64%
10Y*
-1.34%

MGM

1D
0.77%
1M
-3.53%
6M
35.67%
YTD
29.46%
1Y
24.55%
3Y*
-0.71%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
7.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKQ vs. MGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
-14.04%-14.99%-20.92%-8.56%-9.24%71.09%-1.29%50.44%-41.65%32.69%
MGM
MGM Resorts International
29.46%5.31%-22.45%33.25%-25.27%42.47%-4.56%39.69%-26.16%17.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LKQ and MGM is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2003

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LKQ:

$6.47B

MGM:

$12.09B

EPS

LKQ:

$2.02

MGM:

$0.69

PE Ratio

LKQ:

12.60

MGM:

68.58

PS Ratio

LKQ:

0.47

MGM:

0.71

PB Ratio

LKQ:

1.01

MGM:

5.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

LKQ:

$13.92B

MGM:

$17.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LKQ:

$5.25B

MGM:

$5.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

LKQ:

$1.37B

MGM:

$1.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKQ vs. MGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKQ
LKQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
LKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
LKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

MGM
MGM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
MGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKQ vs. MGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKQ Corporation (LKQ) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LKQMGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.15

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

1.08

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

2.30

-3.80

LKQ vs. MGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the MGM Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKQ and MGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LKQ vs. MGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKQ drawdown since its inception was -68.02%, smaller than the maximum MGM drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKQ and MGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKQMGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.02%

-98.11%

+30.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.54%

-22.76%

-11.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.50%

-49.33%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.80%

-49.33%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.02%

-80.42%

+12.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.64%

-49.87%

-2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.14%

-46.42%

+30.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.96%

10.72%

+10.24%

Volatility

LKQ vs. MGM - Volatility Comparison

LKQ Corporation (LKQ) has a higher volatility of 9.61% compared to MGM Resorts International (MGM) at 7.81%. This indicates that LKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKQMGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.61%

7.81%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.75%

31.33%

-7.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.17%

39.02%

-2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.04%

40.38%

-10.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.73%

45.77%

-12.04%

Dividends

LKQ vs. MGM - Dividend Comparison

LKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while MGM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
4.72%3.97%3.27%2.35%1.92%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGM
MGM Resorts International
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.02%0.50%1.56%1.98%1.32%

Financials

LKQ vs. MGM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LKQ Corporation and MGM Resorts International. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B4.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
3.47B
4.45B
(LKQ) Total Revenue
(MGM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LKQ vs. MGM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LKQ Corporation and MGM Resorts International over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
38.4%
0
Portfolio components
LKQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LKQ Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.33B and revenue of 3.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.

MGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MGM Resorts International reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LKQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LKQ Corporation reported an operating income of 217.00M and revenue of 3.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

MGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MGM Resorts International reported an operating income of 301.24M and revenue of 4.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

LKQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LKQ Corporation reported a net income of 79.00M and revenue of 3.47B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.

MGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MGM Resorts International reported a net income of 125.14M and revenue of 4.45B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LKQ and MGM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LKQ has higher volatility (9.61%) compared to MGM (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKQ dropped -68.02% vs MGM's -98.11%.

MGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKQ and MGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer