GSID vs. DFIV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. GSID is passively managed, while DFIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GSID returned 17.46%/yr vs 23.86%/yr for DFIV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSID charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.

Performance

GSID vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSID achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 11.48% return.

GSID

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 10.66%
• 6M: 11.20%
• 1Y: 25.82%
• 3Y*: 17.46%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: —

DFIV

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 11.48%
• 6M: 11.84%
• 1Y: 35.09%
• 3Y*: 23.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSID vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF	10.66%	31.77%	3.60%	17.63%	-14.77%	-1.41%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	11.48%	45.36%	7.26%	17.75%	-3.70%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GSID and DFIV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021	0.92

The correlation between GSID and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSID vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSID	DFIV
Financial Services	24.2%	32.4%
Industrials	19.4%	9.8%
Technology	11.4%	3.2%
Healthcare	10.2%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	4.9%
Basic Materials	6.2%	11.4%
Communication Services	4.7%	4.3%
Energy	3.8%	15.3%
Utilities	3.7%	2.2%
Real Estate	2.1%	1.7%

Return for Risk

GSID vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSID

GSID Risk / Return Rank: 49
GSID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
GSID Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
GSID Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GSID Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
GSID Martin Ratio Rank: 51

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 78
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSID vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSID	DFIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	2.51	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	3.42	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.45	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	3.65	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.49	14.00	-5.51

GSID vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSID Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSID and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSID vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSID drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSID and DFIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSID	DFIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.89%	-25.42%	-4.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.34%	-9.66%	-1.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.96%	-14.72%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-1.07%	+1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.69%	-4.45%	-1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	2.51%	+0.54%

Volatility

GSID vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 4.14%. This indicates that GSID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSID	DFIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.79%	4.14%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.15%	11.44%	+1.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.55%	14.06%	+1.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.31%	16.63%	-0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.33%	16.63%	-0.30%

GSID vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSID has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GSID vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

GSID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than DFIV's 2.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.55%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%	0.00%
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF	2.39%	2.64%	2.90%	2.59%	2.57%	2.93%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSID and DFIV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, GSID and DFIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GSID or DFIV?

GSID has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to DFIV (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSID dropped -29.89% vs DFIV's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, GSID or DFIV?

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.86% vs 17.46% for GSID. On fees, GSID is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSID or DFIV?

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.86% return vs 17.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSID or DFIV?

GSID is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSID or DFIV?

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.39% for GSID.

What is the main difference between GSID and DFIV?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSID and 0.27% for DFIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.