GSID vs. EASG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) and EASG (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - GSID tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index while EASG tracks the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSID returned 8.97%/yr vs 7.62%/yr for EASG. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSID charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for EASG.

Performance

GSID vs. EASG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSID having a 10.66% return and EASG slightly lower at 10.59%.

GSID

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 10.66%
• 6M: 11.20%
• 1Y: 25.82%
• 3Y*: 17.46%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: —

EASG

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 2.70%
• YTD: 10.59%
• 6M: 11.16%
• 1Y: 23.38%
• 3Y*: 14.91%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSID vs. EASG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF	10.66%	31.77%	3.60%	17.63%	-14.77%	10.67%	35.83%
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	10.59%	25.19%	2.26%	18.80%	-16.94%	11.36%	35.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GSID and EASG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020	0.97

The correlation between GSID and EASG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSID vs. EASG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSID	EASG
Financial Services	24.2%	24.6%
Industrials	19.4%	18.1%
Technology	11.4%	13.2%
Healthcare	10.2%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	6.2%
Basic Materials	6.2%	6.1%
Communication Services	4.7%	5.7%
Energy	3.8%	3.0%
Utilities	3.7%	3.7%
Real Estate	2.1%	1.8%

Return for Risk

GSID vs. EASG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSID

GSID Risk / Return Rank: 49
GSID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
GSID Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
GSID Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GSID Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
GSID Martin Ratio Rank: 51

EASG

EASG Risk / Return Rank: 43
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSID vs. EASG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSID	EASG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.47	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.10	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.26	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	2.00	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.49	7.41	+1.09

GSID vs. EASG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSID Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the EASG Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSID and EASG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSID vs. EASG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSID drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, smaller than the maximum EASG drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSID and EASG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSID	EASG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.89%	-32.06%	+2.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.34%	-11.74%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.96%	-16.14%	+2.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.89%	-31.42%	+1.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-0.10%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.69%	-6.15%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	3.16%	-0.11%

Volatility

GSID vs. EASG - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) have volatilities of 4.79% and 4.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSID	EASG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.79%	4.85%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.15%	13.13%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.55%	15.97%	-0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.31%	16.71%	-0.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.33%	18.36%	-2.03%

GSID vs. EASG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSID has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EASG's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GSID vs. EASG - Dividend Comparison

GSID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than EASG's 3.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	3.84%	4.18%	2.93%	2.51%	2.47%	2.69%	1.70%	2.94%	0.85%
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF	2.39%	2.64%	2.90%	2.59%	2.57%	2.93%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSID and EASG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, GSID and EASG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GSID or EASG?

EASG has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to GSID (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSID dropped -29.89% vs EASG's -32.06%.

Which ETF is better, GSID or EASG?

On 5-year performance, GSID leads with 8.97% vs 7.62% for EASG. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSID or EASG?

Over the 5-year period, GSID has performed better with a 8.97% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSID or EASG?

EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GSID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSID or EASG?

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 2.39% for GSID.

What is the main difference between GSID and EASG?

GSID tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index, while EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSID and 0.14% for EASG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.