PortfoliosLab logo
LKQ vs. WM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LKQ and WM is -0.20. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

LKQ vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKQ Corporation (LKQ) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

LKQ:

12.84%

WM:

10.58%

Max Drawdown

LKQ:

-0.18%

WM:

-1.17%

Current Drawdown

LKQ:

0.00%

WM:

-1.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LKQ:

$10.35B

WM:

$93.66B

EPS

LKQ:

$2.69

WM:

$6.63

PE Ratio

LKQ:

14.91

WM:

35.11

PEG Ratio

LKQ:

1.09

WM:

3.03

PS Ratio

LKQ:

0.73

WM:

4.09

PB Ratio

LKQ:

1.68

WM:

10.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

LKQ:

$14.12B

WM:

$22.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LKQ:

$5.46B

WM:

$8.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

LKQ:

$1.68B

WM:

$6.60B

Returns By Period


LKQ

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

WM

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LKQ vs. WM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LKQ is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LKQ is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LKQ is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LKQ is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LKQ is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LKQ is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WM is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WM is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WM is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WM is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WM is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WM is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LKQ vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKQ Corporation (LKQ) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

LKQ vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

LKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than WM's 1.32% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
2.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LKQ vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKQ drawdown since its inception was -0.18%, smaller than the maximum WM drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKQ and WM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LKQ vs. WM - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

LKQ vs. WM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LKQ Corporation and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
3.46B
6.02B
(LKQ) Total Revenue
(WM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LKQ vs. WM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LKQ Corporation and Waste Management, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%42.0%20212022202320242025
39.8%
39.4%
(LKQ) Gross Margin
(WM) Gross Margin
LKQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LKQ Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.38B and revenue of 3.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.

WM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.37B and revenue of 6.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

LKQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LKQ Corporation reported an operating income of 287.00M and revenue of 3.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.

WM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.01B and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

LKQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, LKQ Corporation reported a net income of 169.00M and revenue of 3.46B, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.

WM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 637.00M and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.