PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKQ vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LKQ vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKQ Corporation (LKQ) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKQ achieves a -12.01% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, LKQ has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -0.98%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.27% annualized return.


LKQ

1D
4.37%
1M
-0.86%
6M
-21.68%
YTD
-12.01%
1Y
-27.44%
3Y*
-21.27%
5Y*
-9.76%
10Y*
-0.98%

^GSPC

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.30%
6M
8.49%
YTD
10.05%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKQ vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
-12.01%-14.99%-20.92%-8.56%-9.24%71.09%-1.29%50.44%-41.65%32.69%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.05%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LKQ and ^GSPC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2003

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between LKQ and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKQ vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKQ
LKQ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
LKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
LKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKQ vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKQ Corporation (LKQ) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LKQ^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.29

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

2.24

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.29

9.71

-11.00

LKQ vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKQ and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LKQ vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKQ drawdown since its inception was -68.02%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKQ and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKQ^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.02%

-56.78%

-11.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.54%

-9.10%

-25.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.24%

-18.90%

-35.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.80%

-25.43%

-29.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.02%

-33.92%

-34.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.53%

-1.00%

-50.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-10.70%

-5.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.24%

2.09%

+19.15%

Volatility

LKQ vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

LKQ Corporation (LKQ) has a higher volatility of 10.57% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.25%. This indicates that LKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKQ^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.57%

3.25%

+7.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.20%

10.00%

+14.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.37%

12.56%

+23.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.11%

17.00%

+13.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.75%

18.05%

+15.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKQ and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LKQ has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to ^GSPC (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKQ dropped -68.02% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKQ and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer