PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSID vs. ESGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSID vs. ESGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSID having a 11.93% return and ESGD slightly lower at 11.86%.


GSID

1D
-0.86%
1M
1.26%
6M
6.67%
YTD
11.93%
1Y
25.33%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.38%

ESGD

1D
-0.61%
1M
1.35%
6M
6.47%
YTD
11.86%
1Y
24.51%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
9.52%
ALL TIME*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$32.64M$25.61M$29.96M
$4.14M$2.75M$2.25M

GSID vs. ESGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSID
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
11.93%31.77%3.60%17.63%-14.77%10.67%35.83%
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
11.86%29.63%3.95%18.53%-15.17%11.79%35.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GSID and ESGD is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020

0.98

The correlation between GSID and ESGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSID vs. ESGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSID
ESGD

Financial Services

26.0%
26.3%

Industrials

19.0%
18.3%

Technology

11.3%
13.6%

Healthcare

10.3%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
6.9%

Basic Materials

6.0%
5.0%

Energy

3.9%
3.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
4.1%

Utilities

3.6%
3.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Financial Services

GSID
26.0%
ESGD
26.3%

Industrials

GSID
19.0%
ESGD
18.3%

Technology

GSID
11.3%
ESGD
13.6%

Healthcare

GSID
10.3%
ESGD
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GSID
7.3%
ESGD
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

GSID
6.6%
ESGD
6.9%

Basic Materials

GSID
6.0%
ESGD
5.0%

Energy

GSID
3.9%
ESGD
3.4%

Communication Services

GSID
3.6%
ESGD
4.1%

Utilities

GSID
3.6%
ESGD
3.8%

Real Estate

GSID
1.9%
ESGD
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSID vs. ESGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSID
GSID Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GSID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSID Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GSID Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSID Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGD
ESGD Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ESGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGD Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSID vs. ESGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSIDESGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.08

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

7.87

+0.62

GSID vs. ESGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSID Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the ESGD Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSID and ESGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSID vs. ESGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSID drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, smaller than the maximum ESGD drawdown of -33.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSID and ESGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIDESGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.89%

-33.70%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-11.68%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.96%

-13.86%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.89%

-30.03%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.61%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-6.11%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

3.08%

-0.07%

Volatility

GSID vs. ESGD - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIDESGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

4.66%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.74%

13.83%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.81%

15.97%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

16.75%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.32%

17.01%

-0.69%

GSID vs. ESGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GSID and ESGD have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSID vs. ESGD - Dividend Comparison

GSID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than ESGD's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
3.27%3.60%3.23%3.02%2.59%2.75%1.63%2.57%2.69%2.65%0.09%
GSID
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
2.43%2.64%2.90%2.59%2.57%2.93%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GSID and ESGD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GSID has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to ESGD (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSID dropped -29.89% vs ESGD's -33.70%.

On 5-year performance, GSID leads with 9.10% vs 8.95% for ESGD. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, ESGD has been the lower-risk option at 4.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSID has performed better with a 9.10% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSID and ESGD have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

ESGD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.43% for GSID.

GSID tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index, while ESGD tracks MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares.

GSID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSID and ESGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer