GSID vs. GSIE
GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) and GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from Goldman Sachs - GSID tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index while GSIE tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSID returned 8.97%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for GSIE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSID charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSIE.
Performance
GSID vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSID achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly higher than GSIE's 8.35% return.
GSID
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 25.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- —
GSIE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 22.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
GSID vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 10.66% | 31.77% | 3.60% | 17.63% | -14.77% | 10.67% | 35.83% |
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 8.35% | 32.53% | 5.23% | 16.99% | -15.86% | 13.27% | 35.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSID and GSIE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between GSID and GSIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSID vs. GSIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSID
GSIE
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
GSID
GSIE
Industrials
GSID
GSIE
Technology
GSID
GSIE
Healthcare
GSID
GSIE
Consumer Cyclical
GSID
GSIE
Consumer Defensive
GSID
GSIE
Basic Materials
GSID
GSIE
Communication Services
GSID
GSIE
Energy
GSID
GSIE
Utilities
GSID
GSIE
Real Estate
GSID
GSIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSID vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank
GSID
GSIE
GSID vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSID | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.13 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 8.03 | +0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSID vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSID drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, smaller than the maximum GSIE drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSID and GSIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSID | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -34.63% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -10.76% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -13.07% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.89% | -29.97% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.50% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -6.04% | +0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.84% | +0.21% |
Volatility
GSID vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) at 4.31%. This indicates that GSID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSID | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 4.31% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.15% | 12.09% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.55% | 14.49% | +1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 16.10% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 16.72% | -0.39% |
GSID vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSID has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSID vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison
GSID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than GSIE's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.90% | 2.59% | 2.57% | 2.93% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 2.48% | 2.65% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.60% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, GSID and GSIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSID has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to GSIE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSID dropped -29.89% vs GSIE's -34.63%.
On 5-year performance, GSID leads with 8.97% vs 8.72% for GSIE. On fees, GSID is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GSIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSID has performed better with a 8.97% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSID is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.
GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 2.39% for GSID.
GSID tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index, while GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSID and 0.25% for GSIE.
GSID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSID and GSIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer