LIT vs. MOTO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO).
LIT and MOTO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. MOTO is an actively managed fund by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. It was launched on Nov 15, 2019.
Performance
LIT vs. MOTO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LIT vs. MOTO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 14.63% | 60.05% | -19.19% | -12.18% | -29.91% | 36.74% | 127.88% | 7.27% |
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 3.49% | 27.38% | 2.01% | 27.10% | -27.20% | 17.22% | 59.13% | 4.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIT achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than MOTO's 3.49% return.
LIT
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 14.63%
- 6M
- 31.14%
- 1Y
- 92.83%
- 3Y*
- 6.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.87%
MOTO
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -8.51%
- YTD
- 3.49%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 40.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LIT vs. MOTO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MOTO's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LIT vs. MOTO — Risk / Return Rank
LIT
MOTO
LIT vs. MOTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIT | MOTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.70 | 1.60 | +1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.28 | 2.27 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.31 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.00 | 2.50 | +2.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.45 | 9.54 | +9.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIT | MOTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 1.60 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.26 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.57 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between LIT and MOTO is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LIT vs. MOTO - Dividend Comparison
LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than MOTO's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.42% | 0.49% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% |
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 1.02% | 1.06% | 1.07% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 0.55% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LIT vs. MOTO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIT drawdown since its inception was -65.91%, which is greater than MOTO's maximum drawdown of -38.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIT and MOTO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIT | MOTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.91% | -38.24% | -27.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.61% | -15.57% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.91% | -37.34% | -28.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.86% | -10.12% | -9.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -10.19% | -23.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 4.09% | +0.54% |
Volatility
LIT vs. MOTO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a higher volatility of 11.99% compared to SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) at 9.53%. This indicates that LIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LIT | MOTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.99% | 9.53% | +2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.73% | 16.01% | +8.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.57% | 25.78% | +8.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 23.36% | +8.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 26.30% | +4.20% |