PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LIT vs. ALB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LIT and ALB is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

LIT vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
57.88%
145.74%
LIT
ALB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LIT:

-0.36

ALB:

-0.64

Sortino Ratio

LIT:

-0.32

ALB:

-0.70

Omega Ratio

LIT:

0.97

ALB:

0.92

Calmar Ratio

LIT:

-0.19

ALB:

-0.48

Martin Ratio

LIT:

-0.63

ALB:

-1.21

Ulcer Index

LIT:

18.59%

ALB:

30.33%

Daily Std Dev

LIT:

32.92%

ALB:

57.72%

Max Drawdown

LIT:

-62.61%

ALB:

-77.22%

Current Drawdown

LIT:

-54.98%

ALB:

-72.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIT achieves a -16.72% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's -37.69% return. Over the past 10 years, LIT has outperformed ALB with an annualized return of 8.00%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively lower 5.31% annualized return.


LIT

YTD

-16.72%

1M

-6.89%

6M

7.21%

1Y

-13.77%

5Y*

9.97%

10Y*

8.00%

ALB

YTD

-37.69%

1M

-18.76%

6M

-5.55%

1Y

-38.11%

5Y*

5.91%

10Y*

5.31%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LIT vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LIT, currently valued at -0.36, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.36-0.64
The chart of Sortino ratio for LIT, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00-0.32-0.70
The chart of Omega ratio for LIT, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.970.92
The chart of Calmar ratio for LIT, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.19-0.48
The chart of Martin ratio for LIT, currently valued at -0.63, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.63-1.21
LIT
ALB

The current LIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is higher than the ALB Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIT and ALB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.36
-0.64
LIT
ALB

Dividends

LIT vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than ALB's 1.82% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
1.44%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%1.07%0.32%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
1.82%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.02%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%1.83%1.51%

Drawdowns

LIT vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIT drawdown since its inception was -62.61%, smaller than the maximum ALB drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIT and ALB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-54.98%
-72.05%
LIT
ALB

Volatility

LIT vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) is 8.82%, while Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a volatility of 13.88%. This indicates that LIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.82%
13.88%
LIT
ALB
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab