LIT vs. ICLN
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN).
LIT and ICLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. ICLN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both LIT and ICLN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LIT or ICLN.
Performance
LIT vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIT achieves a -10.55% return, which is significantly higher than ICLN's -21.91% return. Over the past 10 years, LIT has outperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 7.94%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively lower 3.52% annualized return.
LIT
-10.55%
6.84%
1.68%
-7.18%
13.64%
7.94%
ICLN
-21.91%
-9.51%
-17.79%
-12.27%
3.78%
3.52%
Key characteristics
| LIT | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.25 | -0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.15 | -0.67 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.98 | 0.92 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.13 | -0.20 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.46 | -1.24 |
| Ulcer Index | 18.12% | 11.28% |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.79% | 24.81% |
| Max Drawdown | -62.61% | -87.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -51.65% | -68.04% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LIT vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between LIT and ICLN is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LIT vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LIT vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison
LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than ICLN's 1.81% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 1.34% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% | 1.07% | 0.32% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.81% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% | 2.83% | 2.11% |
Drawdowns
LIT vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIT drawdown since its inception was -62.61%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIT and ICLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LIT vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) at 9.50%. This indicates that LIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.