PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIT vs. COPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LIT vs. COPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LIT vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
14.63%60.05%-19.19%-12.18%-29.91%36.74%127.88%3.27%-28.63%64.19%
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
6.35%93.50%3.57%8.38%-0.76%23.39%51.66%12.48%-31.31%38.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIT achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than COPX's 6.35% return. Over the past 10 years, LIT has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 14.87%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.82% annualized return.


LIT

1D
2.54%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
14.63%
6M
31.14%
1Y
92.83%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
14.87%

COPX

1D
7.92%
1M
-20.22%
YTD
6.35%
6M
30.65%
1Y
101.10%
3Y*
28.34%
5Y*
18.72%
10Y*
20.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LIT vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LIT vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIT
LIT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIT vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LITCOPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.70

2.41

+0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

2.75

+0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.38

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

3.46

+1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.45

13.40

+6.05

LIT vs. COPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the COPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIT and COPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LITCOPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.41

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.52

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.59

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.16

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between LIT and COPX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LIT vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison

LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than COPX's 2.52% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
0.42%0.49%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.52%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%

Drawdowns

LIT vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIT drawdown since its inception was -65.91%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIT and COPX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LITCOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.91%

-83.16%

+17.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.61%

-27.82%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.91%

-42.12%

-23.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.91%

-65.41%

-0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.86%

-20.22%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-39.60%

+5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

7.20%

-2.57%

Volatility

LIT vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) is 11.99%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 18.96%. This indicates that LIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LITCOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.99%

18.96%

-6.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.73%

33.75%

-9.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.57%

42.22%

-7.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.68%

36.05%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.50%

35.51%

-5.01%