LAZ vs. ALB
LAZ (Lazard Ltd) and ALB (Albemarle Corporation) are both stocks. LAZ operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while ALB operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, LAZ returned 8.79%/yr vs 9.19%/yr for ALB. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LAZ vs. ALB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAZ achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's 19.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LAZ having a 8.79% annualized return and ALB not far ahead at 9.19%.
LAZ
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- 8.72%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -10.25%
- 1Y
- 12.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.78%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
ALB
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -11.72%
- YTD
- 19.31%
- 6M
- 33.82%
- 1Y
- 200.47%
- 3Y*
- -5.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
LAZ vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAZ Lazard Ltd | -1.16% | -1.64% | 54.83% | 6.92% | -16.21% | 7.41% | 12.08% | 15.22% | -25.38% | 36.20% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 19.31% | 67.72% | -39.50% | -32.80% | -6.63% | 59.76% | 105.39% | -3.28% | -38.89% | 50.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAZ and ALB is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2005 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LAZ and ALB has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
LAZ:
$5.03B
ALB:
$19.97B
LAZ:
$2.61
ALB:
-$2.33
LAZ:
1.53
ALB:
3.61
LAZ:
5.70
ALB:
2.62
LAZ:
$3.28B
ALB:
$5.49B
LAZ:
$1.54B
ALB:
$1.02B
LAZ:
$477.61M
ALB:
$801.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAZ vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank
LAZ
ALB
LAZ vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAZ | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.42 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 9.20 | -8.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.91 | 21.20 | -20.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAZ | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 3.28 | -2.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.01 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.19 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.30 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
LAZ vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAZ drawdown since its inception was -62.72%, smaller than the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAZ and ALB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAZ | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.72% | -83.90% | +21.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.39% | -21.93% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.24% | -78.60% | +34.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.24% | -83.90% | +39.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.51% | -83.90% | +24.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.26% | -45.68% | +28.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.47% | -20.66% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.30% | 9.50% | +3.80% |
Volatility
LAZ vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lazard Ltd (LAZ) is 10.64%, while Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a volatility of 11.91%. This indicates that LAZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAZ | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.64% | 11.91% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.05% | 41.34% | -11.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.86% | 61.57% | -24.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.81% | 54.38% | -17.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.02% | 48.17% | -12.15% |
Dividends
LAZ vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison
LAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than ALB's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 0.96% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
LAZ Lazard Ltd | 4.25% | 4.12% | 3.89% | 5.75% | 5.60% | 4.31% | 4.44% | 5.88% | 8.21% | 5.35% | 6.55% | 5.22% |
Financials
LAZ vs. ALB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lazard Ltd and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LAZ vs. ALB - Profitability Comparison
LAZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a gross profit of 779.40M and revenue of 779.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
ALB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a gross profit of 500.97M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.
LAZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported an operating income of 112.39M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
ALB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported an operating income of 233.51M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
LAZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a net income of 100.92M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.
ALB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a net income of 277.40M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LAZ and ALB have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALB has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to LAZ (10.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAZ dropped -62.72% vs ALB's -83.90%.
ALB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAZ and ALB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer