PortfoliosLab logo
LAZ vs. C
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LAZ and C is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LAZ vs. C - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and Citigroup Inc. (C). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
279.36%
-76.17%
LAZ
C

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LAZ:

0.32

C:

0.49

Sortino Ratio

LAZ:

0.74

C:

0.95

Omega Ratio

LAZ:

1.10

C:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

LAZ:

0.28

C:

0.22

Martin Ratio

LAZ:

0.79

C:

1.86

Ulcer Index

LAZ:

15.87%

C:

10.30%

Daily Std Dev

LAZ:

47.23%

C:

33.92%

Max Drawdown

LAZ:

-62.72%

C:

-98.00%

Current Drawdown

LAZ:

-27.36%

C:

-81.36%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAZ:

$3.72B

C:

$131.19B

EPS

LAZ:

$2.89

C:

$6.33

PE Ratio

LAZ:

14.32

C:

11.10

PEG Ratio

LAZ:

1.00

C:

1.04

PS Ratio

LAZ:

1.24

C:

1.83

PB Ratio

LAZ:

6.17

C:

0.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAZ:

$3.00B

C:

$98.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAZ:

$1.44B

C:

$57.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

LAZ:

$480.96M

C:

$25.46B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAZ achieves a -14.65% return, which is significantly lower than C's 3.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LAZ has underperformed C with an annualized return of 3.04%, while C has yielded a comparatively higher 5.84% annualized return.


LAZ

YTD

-14.65%

1M

30.28%

6M

-24.61%

1Y

14.99%

5Y*

15.74%

10Y*

3.04%

C

YTD

3.03%

1M

12.27%

6M

5.67%

1Y

16.66%

5Y*

13.28%

10Y*

5.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LAZ vs. C — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LAZ is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LAZ is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LAZ is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LAZ is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LAZ is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LAZ is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

C
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of C is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of C is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of C is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of C is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of C is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of C is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LAZ vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LAZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the C Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAZ and C, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.32
0.49
LAZ
C

Dividends

LAZ vs. C - Dividend Comparison

LAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than C's 3.14% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
4.65%3.89%5.75%5.60%4.31%4.44%4.78%8.21%5.35%6.55%5.22%2.40%
C
Citigroup Inc.
3.14%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%0.07%

Drawdowns

LAZ vs. C - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAZ drawdown since its inception was -62.72%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAZ and C. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-27.36%
-81.36%
LAZ
C

Volatility

LAZ vs. C - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Ltd (LAZ) has a higher volatility of 16.46% compared to Citigroup Inc. (C) at 9.18%. This indicates that LAZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
16.46%
9.18%
LAZ
C

Financials

LAZ vs. C - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lazard Ltd and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20212022202320242025
669.16M
41.46B
(LAZ) Total Revenue
(C) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items