PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ALB vs. SQM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ALBSQM
YTD Return-20.16%-27.75%
1Y Return-35.91%-27.04%
3Y Return (Ann)-11.63%-1.55%
5Y Return (Ann)10.07%9.54%
10Y Return (Ann)7.21%8.66%
Sharpe Ratio-0.66-0.62
Daily Std Dev51.92%46.88%
Max Drawdown-66.31%-77.80%
Current Drawdown-64.18%-56.28%

Fundamentals


ALBSQM
Market Cap$13.18B$12.85B
EPS$13.36$7.05
PE Ratio8.396.38
PEG Ratio1.513.90
Revenue (TTM)$9.62B$7.47B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.08B$5.74B
EBITDA (TTM)$897.07M$3.16B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between ALB and SQM is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ALB vs. SQM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a -20.16% return, which is significantly higher than SQM's -27.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ALB has underperformed SQM with an annualized return of 7.21%, while SQM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.66% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-14.45%
-12.90%
ALB
SQM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Albemarle Corporation

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ALB vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.66, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.73, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.73
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ALB, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.91
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.52
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.93, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.93
SQM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SQM, currently valued at -0.62, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.62
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SQM, currently valued at -0.73, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.73
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SQM, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.92
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SQM, currently valued at -0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SQM, currently valued at -0.98, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.98

ALB vs. SQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALB Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which roughly equals the SQM Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ALB and SQM.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.40-1.20-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.20NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-0.66
-0.62
ALB
SQM

Dividends

ALB vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison

ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than SQM's 11.76% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
1.39%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.01%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%1.83%1.51%
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
11.76%8.50%9.79%3.91%1.65%4.59%5.41%2.38%5.31%2.37%5.80%3.94%

Drawdowns

ALB vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -66.31%, smaller than the maximum SQM drawdown of -77.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and SQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-64.18%
-56.28%
ALB
SQM

Volatility

ALB vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a higher volatility of 16.24% compared to Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) at 13.51%. This indicates that ALB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
16.24%
13.51%
ALB
SQM

Financials

ALB vs. SQM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Albemarle Corporation and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items