ALB vs. SQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ALB or SQM.
Correlation
The correlation between ALB and SQM is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ALB vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ALB:
-0.81
SQM:
-0.41
ALB:
-1.13
SQM:
-0.35
ALB:
0.87
SQM:
0.96
ALB:
-0.56
SQM:
-0.26
ALB:
-1.42
SQM:
-0.90
ALB:
33.24%
SQM:
20.37%
ALB:
58.71%
SQM:
44.34%
ALB:
-83.90%
SQM:
-78.66%
ALB:
-81.55%
SQM:
-65.58%
Fundamentals
ALB:
$6.55B
SQM:
$9.68B
ALB:
-$11.38
SQM:
-$1.40
ALB:
0.99
SQM:
0.69
ALB:
1.22
SQM:
2.14
ALB:
0.83
SQM:
1.95
ALB:
$4.02B
SQM:
$4.52B
ALB:
$23.60M
SQM:
$1.25B
ALB:
-$1.00B
SQM:
$1.15B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a -32.04% return, which is significantly lower than SQM's -1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ALB has underperformed SQM with an annualized return of 1.35%, while SQM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.47% annualized return.
ALB
-32.04%
-25.11%
-38.28%
-48.63%
-0.01%
1.35%
SQM
-1.43%
-16.09%
-11.24%
-16.93%
14.43%
8.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ALB vs. SQM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ALB
SQM
ALB vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ALB vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than SQM's 0.39% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 2.78% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% | 1.83% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 0.39% | 0.39% | 5.41% | 6.26% | 2.54% | 1.09% | 2.98% | 3.79% | 1.97% | 4.12% | 0.15% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
ALB vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -83.90%, which is greater than SQM's maximum drawdown of -78.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and SQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ALB vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a higher volatility of 30.65% compared to Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) at 20.57%. This indicates that ALB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ALB vs. SQM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Albemarle Corporation and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities