ALB vs. SQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ALB or SQM.
Key characteristics
ALB | SQM | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | -20.16% | -27.75% |
1Y Return | -35.91% | -27.04% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -11.63% | -1.55% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 10.07% | 9.54% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 7.21% | 8.66% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.66 | -0.62 |
Daily Std Dev | 51.92% | 46.88% |
Max Drawdown | -66.31% | -77.80% |
Current Drawdown | -64.18% | -56.28% |
Fundamentals
ALB | SQM | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $13.18B | $12.85B |
EPS | $13.36 | $7.05 |
PE Ratio | 8.39 | 6.38 |
PEG Ratio | 1.51 | 3.90 |
Revenue (TTM) | $9.62B | $7.47B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $3.08B | $5.74B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $897.07M | $3.16B |
Correlation
The correlation between ALB and SQM is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ALB vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a -20.16% return, which is significantly higher than SQM's -27.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ALB has underperformed SQM with an annualized return of 7.21%, while SQM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.66% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ALB vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ALB vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than SQM's 11.76% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Albemarle Corporation | 1.39% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% | 1.83% | 1.51% |
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 11.76% | 8.50% | 9.79% | 3.91% | 1.65% | 4.59% | 5.41% | 2.38% | 5.31% | 2.37% | 5.80% | 3.94% |
Drawdowns
ALB vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -66.31%, smaller than the maximum SQM drawdown of -77.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and SQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ALB vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a higher volatility of 16.24% compared to Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) at 13.51%. This indicates that ALB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ALB vs. SQM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Albemarle Corporation and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities