PortfoliosLab logo

ALB vs. SQM

Last updated Jun 3, 2023

Compare and contrast key facts about Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ALB or SQM.

Key characteristics


ALBSQM
YTD Return-3.74%-10.39%
1Y Return-16.56%-27.39%
5Y Return (Ann)18.72%11.78%
10Y Return (Ann)13.87%9.12%
Sharpe Ratio-0.26-0.42
Daily Std Dev48.96%55.14%
Max Drawdown-66.31%-77.80%

Fundamentals


ALBSQM
Market Cap$22.94B$18.93B
EPS$31.21$13.51
PE Ratio6.274.90
PEG Ratio0.320.14
Revenue (TTM)$8.77B$10.95B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.08B$5.74B
EBITDA (TTM)$3.67B$5.71B

Correlation

0.38
-1.001.00

The correlation between ALB and SQM is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

ALB vs. SQM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than SQM's -10.39% return. Over the past 10 years, ALB has outperformed SQM with an annualized return of 13.87%, while SQM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.12% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%2023FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
-21.17%
-22.29%
ALB
SQM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs


Albemarle Corporation

ALB vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison

ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than SQM's 18.22% yield.


TTM20222021202020192018201720162015201420132012
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
0.95%0.73%0.67%1.06%2.08%1.83%1.07%1.53%2.28%2.06%1.73%1.50%
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
18.22%10.26%4.45%1.95%5.58%6.86%3.16%7.27%3.44%8.63%6.16%3.44%

ALB vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioUlcer Index
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
-0.26
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
-0.42

ALB vs. SQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALB Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is higher than the SQM Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ALB and SQM.


-0.500.000.501.001.502.002023FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
-0.26
-0.42
ALB
SQM

ALB vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALB drawdown for the period was -46.67%, roughly equal to the maximum SQM drawdown of -41.11%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for ALB and SQM


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%2023FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
-35.74%
-33.59%
ALB
SQM

ALB vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) have volatilities of 13.18% and 12.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%2023FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
13.18%
12.73%
ALB
SQM