LAZ vs. AB
Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LAZ or AB.
Correlation
The correlation between LAZ and AB is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
LAZ vs. AB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LAZ:
0.32
AB:
1.24
LAZ:
0.74
AB:
1.83
LAZ:
1.10
AB:
1.25
LAZ:
0.28
AB:
1.23
LAZ:
0.79
AB:
8.19
LAZ:
15.87%
AB:
4.47%
LAZ:
47.23%
AB:
28.66%
LAZ:
-62.72%
AB:
-87.65%
LAZ:
-27.36%
AB:
-2.96%
Fundamentals
LAZ:
$3.72B
AB:
$4.62B
LAZ:
$2.89
AB:
$3.79
LAZ:
14.32
AB:
11.02
LAZ:
1.00
AB:
0.63
LAZ:
1.24
AB:
9.10
LAZ:
6.17
AB:
2.32
LAZ:
$3.00B
AB:
$458.42M
LAZ:
$1.44B
AB:
$458.42M
LAZ:
$480.96M
AB:
$436.88M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAZ achieves a -14.65% return, which is significantly lower than AB's 15.31% return. Over the past 10 years, LAZ has underperformed AB with an annualized return of 3.04%, while AB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.22% annualized return.
LAZ
-14.65%
30.28%
-24.61%
14.99%
15.74%
3.04%
AB
15.31%
15.75%
16.50%
35.09%
22.23%
12.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LAZ vs. AB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LAZ
AB
LAZ vs. AB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LAZ vs. AB - Dividend Comparison
LAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, less than AB's 8.17% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAZ Lazard Ltd | 4.65% | 3.89% | 5.75% | 5.60% | 4.31% | 4.44% | 4.78% | 8.21% | 5.35% | 6.55% | 5.22% | 2.40% |
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 8.17% | 8.03% | 8.44% | 10.30% | 7.33% | 8.26% | 7.67% | 10.54% | 8.50% | 7.46% | 8.09% | 7.32% |
Drawdowns
LAZ vs. AB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAZ drawdown since its inception was -62.72%, smaller than the maximum AB drawdown of -87.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAZ and AB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LAZ vs. AB - Volatility Comparison
Lazard Ltd (LAZ) has a higher volatility of 16.46% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) at 8.45%. This indicates that LAZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LAZ vs. AB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lazard Ltd and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities